Start Organizing A Real Resistance Now!

Lame Liberals Hopelessly Out Of Touch

1 (253)

(Caption: I took this photo about 10 years ago in front of the NJ DEP building in Trenton, NJ. I think it was at a anti-fracking protest.)

The NY Times ran a page one lead story (Sunday edition) today on the formation of a US “Resistance” to what is increasingly looking like a Trump re-election, see:

(parenthetically, they really tap danced around the collapse of the Biden Presidency and failed to even mention real resistance movement formation, like the campus encampments and organizing for protests at the Democrats’ August convention in Chicago. Instead, we get this:

Activist groups that spent the four years of Mr. Trump’s presidency organizing mass protests and pursuing legal challenges, ultimately helping channel that energy into persuading voters to oust him from power in 2020, are now realizing with great dread they may have to resist him all over again.)

Sadly, all the same old lame liberals could come up with was stockpiling abortion pills (seriously, no joke), gathering informal groups of Democratic Governors and Attorneys General, and “a new litigation wave”: drafting legal briefs (to a right wing Federalist Society and corporate captured federal court system).

What we need is formation of “popular front” politics and planning and organizing for massive mobilizations of street protests, encampments, and civil disobedience to shut it down and “Refuse Fascism”.

Does anyone see this kind of work being done?

Start the logistics planning and the slogans and flags and banners and songs and signs and fundraising NOW.

But do it off line and don’t use cell phones (the surveillance State is a Panopticon).

[End Note: And if you think I engage in hyperbole, consider that they are quietly seeking to reinstate the draft – check this out, which should be blaring page one headlines:

https://www.militarytimes.com/news/pentagon-congress/2024/05/23/lawmakers-move-to-automate-selective-service-registration-for-all-men/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Bordentown Environmental Commission: “Noise Is A Serious Issue”

the author debates history (Bordentown, NJ - 4/27/13)

the author debates history (Bordentown, NJ – 4/27/13)

I got an email today titled  “Noise is a serious issue” from the Bordentown City Environmental Commission announcing an upcoming presentation: “The Rising Costs of Noise Pollution”

It brought back fond memories (photo essay) of when I lived there – including the disaster that occurred when I tried to get enforcement of an egregious noise violation.

Perversely, I ended up charged by police for “interfering in a police investigation” (the charge was later dropped by the local prosecutor).

The prosecutor had no choice, because I found that the flawed local noise ordinance was not enforceable and that it has been invalidated by the NJ Supreme Court. I wrote:

Bordentown Police lack training and equipment and funding to meet state standards and have not sought delegation. And the NJ Supreme Court had invalidated the local ordinance I was threatened with violating.

I wrote about the ordeal in this post:

I reached  out to the Environmental Commission to ask if the flaws I identified have been remedied over the last 9 years. I doubt it.

I’m not holding my breath for a reply. We’ll let you know.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

NJ LCV Op-Ed On Liberty State Park Is Disgusting Hypocrisy

NJ LCV Led The Campaign That Took Over $250 Million Away From State Parks

Potosnak Steals The Work Of Sam Pesin, A Legendary Leader In Protecting The Park

Ed Potosnak is the guy in the pink tie

Ed Potosnak is the guy in the pink tie

NJ Spotlight published an Op-Ed today by Ed Potosnak of NJ LCV in support of DEP’s proposed Liberty State Park Plan, see:

Potosnak is perhaps Gov. Murphy’s and DEP Commissioner LaTourette’s lead cheerleader, see:

Potosnak not only has done very little of the real grassroots work of protecting Liberty State Park – which has been done for decades by Sam Pesin of Friends of LSP – he led the Statewide campaign that diverted over $250 MILLION from State Parks maintenance, leading to the current $720 MILLION unfunded deficit in State Parks maintenance.

Potosnak has done more harm to State Parks than anyone.

I was so disgusted I fired off this note to NJ Spotlight and DEP Commissioner LaTourette:

———- Original Message ———-

From: Bill WOLFE <b>

To: “ferencem@njspotlightnews.org” <ferencem@njspotlightnews.org>, “jonhurdle@gmail.com” <jonhurdle@gmail.com>, “ed.potosnak@njlcv.org” <ed.potosnak@njlcv.org>

Cc: Sam Pesin <pesinliberty@earthlink.net>, “shawn.latourette@dep.nj.gov” <shawn.latourette@dep.nj.gov>, “wparry@ap.org” <wparry@ap.org>, “tmoran@starledger.com” <tmoran@starledger.com>

Date: 06/06/2024 8:59 AM EDT

Subject: Potosnak Op-Ed LSP

Dear NJ Spotlight:

Your Op-Ed on LSP left a lot out, including the fact that the author led a statewide campaign that stole previously constitutionally dedicated Corporate Business Tax funds – specifically $32 million per year to State Parks maintenance – and reprogrammed that money for other purposes. (other CBT proceeds dedicated to DEP water resource and toxic waste cleanup CBT funds were stripped as well).

At the time (2014), there was a $400 million backlog in State Parks maintenance projects. That deficit is now $720 million and it is unfunded.

The head of the NJ State Parks system at the time wrote:

“Mark Texel, head of the New Jersey Division of Parks and Forestry, called it a “massive blow” and said in a Facebook post soon after the vote that it was “the darkest day I have faced in my professional career.”

No need to take my word for it, read the Bergen Record story:

https://www.northjersey.com/story/news/environment/2017/06/28/archive-budget-cuts-doom-state-parks-disrepair/400817001/

It is the height of hypocrisy for this author to now pretend to be some kind of leader on State Parks.

And he usurped the real leadership of a true hero, Sam Pesin, who has led campaigns to protect LSP for over 40 years.

Do better.

Bill Wolfe

ps – if you want all the details, read this piece:

  • An Open Letter To Gov. Murphy’s Environmental Lapdogs

http://www.wolfenotes.com/2024/05/an-open-letter-to-gov-murphys-environmental-lapdogs/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

From The “Big Map” To NJ ADAPT

A Legacy Of Opportunism, Careerism, Incompetence, & Cheerleading

The Revolving Door Also Opens To Rutgers

[Update: 6/18/24: Just got this email from Rutgers:

Jeanne Herb, founding CCRC co-director, will be retiring as Executive Director of the Environmental Analysis and Communications Group at the Bloustein School effective June 30.

No comment. ~~~ end update]

I just got a belly laugh from this note from Rutgers’ NJ Climate Change Resource Center, which struck dissonant cords of historical memory (emphases mine):

In consultation with the NJDEP, the NJ Climate Change Resource Center at Rutgers University prepared a new data layer for non-regulatory planning purposes consistent with the new 2023 DFE for inclusion in its NJADAPTsuite of data visualization and mapping tools. The new data layer provides a crucial understanding of where Design Flood Elevations will change for new construction and redevelopment and can support local efforts to safeguard critical facilities and community assets.

It is important to note that the new data layer is meant to be used as a non-regulatory planning tool for reference only and should not be relied upon for site-specific flood impact analyses, permitting, or other legal or regulatory purposes. The accuracy of this dataset is limited by the data and methods available to create it. This dataset is not based on survey-quality data and must not be used in replacement of survey data.

Why is Rutgers, an academic institution, cheerleading for the Murphy DEP? (while training the development community engineers and planners).

Looking at Rutgers staff heading up the project – could that be a result of the DEP revolving door?

PANELISTS

NJ Climate Change Resource Center:

Jeanne Herb

Lucas Marxen

Jonathan DeLura

Pritpal Bamhrah

Marjorie Kaplan

NJ Dept. of Environmental Protection:

Kunal Patel

1 (249)Jeanne Herb has no training or experience in hydrology, planning, engineering, GIS mapping, oceanography, law, or any other relevant field to manage this climate adaptation program.

Herb began her political career at DEP as a democratic administration political operative who first capitalized on her husband’s (Jeff Scott, then CWA 1034 DEP Union Rep.) relationships with the Florio administration. Based on those connections – not academic credentials and experience – she was installed as the Bureau Chief of the new Pollution Prevention Act program.

Full disclosure: Jeff Scott sold me out in my whistleblower administrative hearings by directing – behind my back – my CWA paid lawyer to go easy, not subpoena DEP Commissioner Shinn, sell me out, and settle without litigation and discovery, which would have revealed his dirty hands and cost him his union job and jeopardized union negotiations with the Whitman administration on DEP’s budget.]

Prior to that, Herb used her well developed bureaucratic manipulator skills to leverage power and influence across the entire Department via administration of DEP’s Spill Act research grant money. She administered the program funding – she did not do scientific work.

[Full disclosure: I represented the DEP Divisions of Hazardous Waste Management and Solid Waste Management on Herb’s grant application funding  and”peer review” team.]

After a total failure and the corporate capture and collapse of the Pollution Prevention Program, she served as a management hack for Gov. Corzine’s DEP Chief Lisa Jackson.

[Full disclosure: I was at NJ PEER at the time and was a harsh critic, among many other things, exposing a “Gag Order” on DEP scientists issued by Herb.]

Failing up again, Herb was later promoted to the head of DEP’s Office Of Policy and Planning under Gov. McGreevey’s DEP Commissioner Brad Campbell.

[Full disclosure: I was hired by Campbell and worked in that Office.]

In that role, Herb was the Cheerleader in Chief for Campbell’s misguided and disastrous failure known as “The Big Map”. For the policy wonks out there, see:

[Update: sorry, DEP killed that link. So I just filed an OPRA for the document. I hope DEP doesn’t sue me for “interfering with government operations” now that Gov. Murphy just signed into law a bill that guts OPRA.]

[Full disclosure: I was a strong internal critic of the Big Map, and warned Campbell multiple times – in memo’s and in the presence of Gov. McGreevey’s staff; the DEP Management Team, and even external Environmental Groups – that the Big Map was fatally flawed scientifically, legally, and politically and would destroy DEP’s credibility and his leadership.

This infuriated Campbell. For doing that, Campbell threatened (twice) to fire me for undermining his leadership and sabotaging his highest priority and legacy project.]

Remarkably, one of the prime reasons for warnings of failure was based on the verbatim qualification in the Rutgers NJ ADAPT mapping exercise. Specifically, that the Big Map:

should not be relied upon for site-specific flood impact analyses, permitting, or other legal or regulatory purposes

Herb and Campbell completely ignored my multiple warnings, which were based on DEP GIS experts.

Campbell was determined to use the Big Map for “permitting and regulatory purposes”.

Just as I predicted, the Big Map was viciously attacked technically, legally and politically; multiple mapping errors were exposed; DEP’s credibility suffered a major blow; Campbell’s leadership was destroyed; and the project collapsed in flames and had to be withdrawn, humiliating Campbell (as the NY Times reported (6/26/05).

  • These Days, a Commissioner Is Under Siege

“The guy talks out of three sides of his mouth,” said Bill Wolfe, an aide to Mr. Campbell for two years who is now organizing a campaign against the fast-track law.

So, life is not fair, the truth does not always prevail, and the revolving door doesn’t always open in the corporate world.

Sometimes, for well connected people like Herb, it opens in cushy “academic” slots – as long as loyalty comes first.

[End note: Email from a friend who was there:

I would change to from Big Map to more pro development crap

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Murphy DEP Proposal To Delist Bald Eagle Raises Important Questions

Delisting Eliminates Regulatory Protections Of Habitat That Could Set Back Progress

Decision Based On A Narrow Scientific Consensus Process With Conflicts Of Interest 

No Role For The Public Or For Policy and Value Judgments

Kootenai River, northern Montana about 40 miles from Canadian border

Kootenai River, northern Montana about 40 miles from Canadian border

As we warned back in February, the Murphy DEP just proposed new rules that would delist the Bald Eagle from threatened and endangered species program status, and thereby eliminate regulatory protections of habitat, see:

I guess the conservation community failed to weigh in and nip that in the bud as I recommended.

In a bizarre and Orwellian move, the Murphy DEP issued a press release yesterday touting their efforts and this “milestone” (as if this was no big deal or policy decision, just a routine progression). I guess they think that going on offense is the best defense, see:

I am not a conservation biologist, but I have strong views and strongly oppose this misguided decision.

So, before I write to criticize the DEP decision, because I lack the expertise, I just posed these questions to a real PhD conservation biologist I trust: (note to readers: please email me with your thoughts):

XXXXX – I’m writing about this [bald eagle delisting]. I’d like your thoughts on the following questions I have:

1) The Clean Water Act has a concept known as “anti-backsliding”. Basically, that means that when water quality improves (and would allow more pollution), polluters can not relax current permits and get less stringent permits, even though less stringent permits otherwise would meet water quality standards.

As applied to endangered species, that would mean something like that when populations are restored, you can’t relax protections that might jeopardize the progress. In this case, elimination of habitat protections for bald eagle could wipe out the progress made.

Suppose EPA said that it was OK to start using DDT again because the bald eagle recovered?

Does conservation biology have a similar concept as anti-backsliding?

Same question on the “precautionary principle” (which I assume you understand).

2) What is the role of science in listing decisions? Is it acceptable for decision-makers to be more conservative (protective) than warranted by science based on public preferences or policy judgements?

3) I note the bald eagle delisting recommendation was made pursuant to the Delphi consensus process. Do you support the concept of consensus as a basis for decision-making?

4) I note that the delisting recommendation was made by a DEP selected small group of NJ based scientists. Do you feel that this is an adequate scientific review process?

5) I note that there was no role for the public (or other scientists, experts, or interested parties) in the delisting recommendation (science) and DEP regulatory proposal to implement that delisting. Are you OK with that?

6) I understand that the final decision was made by Commissioner LaTourette. Do you think he is qualified and properly motivated to make that decision?

I’d prefer quick written replies, because whenever I get on the phone, my mind wanders all over the place.

Wolfe

[End Note: The NJ Builders Association website lists this DEP proposal as a “helpful link”. That’s really all you need to know:

Helpful Links

Find Your State Legislator

NJ Board of Public Utilities

NJ Department of Community Affairs

NJ Department of Environmental Protection

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment