Archive

Author Archive

Biden Backed Fracking And LNG Exports Skyrocket

December 8th, 2022 No comments

Meanwhile, NJ Environmentalists And Media Diddle And Defend Biden

Biden Cements The US Role As Climate Outlaw And Imperial Hegemon

Screen Shot 2022-12-08 at 9.01.26 AM

The Biden administration is using a “whole of government” approach to vastly increase US natural gas fracking and LNG exports to Europe, see:

Based on Biden’s Executive Orders and policy, the US Energy Department, State Department, Pentagon, FERC, Commerce Department, and EPA are all promoting US gas production, transmission, and export. Even Biden’s Climate Czar – the incredible shrinking man John Kerry – is all in on the scheme.

Never before in US history – at least since the 19the century continental expansion of the railroads or the domestic economic mobilization for World War 2 – have the federal government and corporations so aggressively planned and coordinated efforts to achieve mutual goals, which are: imperial hegemony in Biden’s US foreign policy and maximization of corporate profits and power. US EIA:

Screen Shot 2022-12-08 at 9.54.28 AM

As a result, US climate goals are increasingly exposed as sham slogans and the US becomes a climate outlaw in the eyes of the world.

So much for that trite phrase of the Founding Fathers about the importance of a “decent respect to the opinions of mankind”.

US energy companies are making multi-billion record profits as they rip off hostage European consumers (I’ve read that US LNG prices are five times the Russian Nordstream pipeline price) and US domestic energy prices rise as well as the domestic gas glut is exported to Europe. Natural Gas Industry:

During a scorching summer that fueled robust cooling demand in the Lower 48 and in Europe – combined with precarious storage supplies globally – U.S. prices soared to 14-year highs around $9.00/MMBtu. This elicited calls from consumer and manufacturing advocates to curb exports of liquefied natural gas to preserve supplies for domestic use. This, they argued, could help contain U.S. costs this winter, when both demand and prices are widely anticipated to rise anew after a fall weather reprieve.

We thought we’d bring you these realties and hard news, because NJ environmentalists and media sure aren’t doing any of that. Just read the latest example today from NJ Spotlight. Talk about debating angels and pinheads while ROME LITERALLY BURNS!

They don’t criticize Democrats and have become an arm of the Democratic Party.

Well, here’s where we’re heading folks: The Course Of Empire:

1920px-Cole_Thomas_The_Course_of_Empire_Destruction_1836

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Emergencies Happen – And So Do Draconian Government Mandates

December 7th, 2022 No comments

NJ Supreme Court Just Sanctioned Draconian Government “Emergency” Restrictions

Court Rules That By The Time You Can Legally Challenge Them, The Damage Is Done

NJ Courts Effectively Gut Constitutional Due Process Rights

Don’t think that emergency rules can’t kill you too

I am shocked and appalled by the cavalier attitude and response to the DEP’s “emergency rules” to authorize a bear hunt by the NJ Courts, the press, the NJ Bar Association, the law schools and professors, the business community, and so called “progressive” defenders of Constitutional rights and rule of law (liberal groups like the ACLU on one end of the spectrum and Federalist Society libertarians on the other).

So, I just went on a Twitter rant to illustrate the kinds of “emergencies” that could occur and the government regulatory mandates that could follow.

Does anyone think that government won’t exaggerate – or even manufacture – an emergency that makes it easier for them to impose requirements unilaterally and quickly if the Courts, media, and the public don’t strenuously object?

Based on the NJ Supreme Court’s decision today, it would be highly unlikely to secure injunctive relief to block these absurd government restrictions and you wouldn’t have recourse to the Courts until after the damage was already done (the NJ Administrative Procedure Act law sets a 60 day period where emergency rules are allowed to be in effect by government fiat, without your review or participation (i.e no due process). The Supreme Court just made that worse by erecting barriers to injunctive relief.)

Recall that DEP was backed off politically – not legally – from adopting flood rules as emergency rules this summer. But once a Governor and DEP realize that the Courts will not take a hard look and they can slap dash some “science” and scary PR rhetoric as pretext, they will adopt emergency rule across a broad spectrum – I lay out some not infeasible scenarios here.

I can’t believe the right wingers who seek to “dismantle the administrative state” aren’t going crazy over this:

Given the stakes, how is it possible that this issue is being virtually ignored?

1. Another Superstorm Sandy hits. Far worse devastation. Over 2 million people homeless. DEP, Pinelands, and Highlands issue emergency rules suspending all land use and environmental regulations to promote recovery and reconstruction. Get real, some of this at DEP already happened after Sandy.

2. Catastrophic wildfire in the Pinelands kills 5 emergency responders and 15 residents. DEP Commissioner suspends all environmental regulations and orders that 500,000 acres of forests be immediately logged (“thinned”) to prevent future wildfire. This is almost happening now.

3. The second amendment gun rights people should fear what State government could do via emergency regulations. It is not unrealistic to fear a State government emergency ban on sale of guns & ammo under a civil “emergency” (riot, insurrection, rebellion, protests. etc). Wake up

4. BLM, anti-war, free speech, and civil rights advocates should fear what State government could do under emergency rules: Curfews, protest zones, permit and insurance requirements for demonstrations, or outright bans on parades, protests, events. No joke.

5. If anyone thinks COVID restrictions were bad, just look at what China lock down did to people & the economy. NJ State government could impose all that and more under emergency rules. Again, by the time you go to court to legally challenge  it – no injunction allowed! – the damage is done. Like bears.

6. Recreational and commercial fishermen don’t like quotas and catch limits set by Mid Atlantic Fisheries Council? How about a summer ban on flounder & scallops imposed by DEP emergency rules? It could happen and you know it RFA!

7. Golf courses, farmers, water parks, and homeowners don’t like those pesky irrigation restrictions and odd/even lawn watering days and bans on car washing set by DEP during a drought? Think of that and worse under DEP emergency rules for an entire summer. The NJ Courts will allow that and you will be screwed.

8. Anyone think that rolling blackouts are limited to war zones in places like Ukraine? Or energy crisis in Europe? How about DEP & BPU rolling blackouts & shutdown of large commercial energy users during a “climate” or “extreme heat emergency”. It’s coming. You will have no say.

9. DEP has already shut down lakes and beaches due to toxic algae blooms & high fecal coliform. But they were temporary. Just think of a DEP “emergency rule” to 90 day “temporarily” ban swimming and boating in lakes, bays and ocean beaches. Shut down the shore. It can happen now.

10. Air quality emergency? High ozone levels? Smoke from western fires? Thousands of emergency room visits in Newark? DEP issues an emergency rule to ban travel and major commercial/industrial pollution sources from 9 am to 5 pm, June 1 to Sept. 1. It will happen. You are screwed.

11. Excessive heat emergency. Temperatures exceed 115 degrees. Hundreds die in Newark, Camden and North jersey. Gov. declares “climate emergency”. DEP issues emergency rules banning any pollution source operating from 9 am to 5 pm, closes NJ Turnpike and Garden State parkway and tunnel to NYC, and mandates that Malls and businesses provide air conditioned shelter, water, and food for stressed urban residents with no AC. No compensation for costs incurred.

12. Terrorists threatens to blow up US refineries and chemical plants. US Dept. Homeland Security issues terror alerts. NJ Dept. Homeland Security issues emergency rules to shut down refineries and chemical plants. Gas lines form circa 1973. Prices skyrocket. Immediate energy crisis forces government rationing and travel restrictions. Live with it.

13. War in Ukraine expands. Europe suffers energy crisis, with thousands of people dying of cold with no heat. Biden issues national directive to supply Europe with US energy supplies. Gov.Murphy issues emergency rules mandating that NJ export natural gas & oil. Prices skyrocket. You have to pay, with no say.

14. European war triggers global energy crisis. Biden orders maximization of US production. DEP issues an emergency rule to suspend all air quality, safety , fuel, waste, and other regulations on refineries and pipelines to maximize fossil production. It’s already happened on an incremental basis.

15.  Newark cop shoots a black kid. City erupts in protest. Proud Boys & Oath Keepers hold White Supremacy rallies in Camden & Newark. Antifa responds. Riots ensue. Gov. Murphy issue emergency rule curfew and total shutdown. Bans sale of guns and ammo. No relief from NJ courts.

16. Foreign off shore wind corporations threaten to walk away from construction contracts unless they get paid more. Gov. Murphy’s BPU issues a 90 day emergency rule increasing electric bills by 50% to pay off the wind vendors. You have no say in that and no relief from NJ Courts. Just pay your PSE&G bills and shut up.

17.  Avian bird flu strikes in Warren County. Viral infected bats linked to exposure from eating NJ fruits & vegetables. Mutant fungus infects crops. NJ Dept. of Agriculture issues emergency rules mandating slaughter of all chickens & pigs, & burning all fruit & vegetable crops. Yup.

18. New deadly variant of COVID emerges. NJ Dept. of Health issues mandatory lockdown and vaccine ID cards, with facial and digital recognition, required to enter any public building, bus, train, plane, or public place. Penalty is jail and isolation. You have no opportunity to object.

19. Ten kids die of mysterious unknown virus. NJ Department of health issues an emergency rule (Order) shutting down all school, daycares, and commercial enterprises where kids are present. NJDOH cites no science to support their Order, instead relies on mere projections of risks. DEP did just that for bear hunt, and the Court was OK with it.

20. Newark port workers go on strike. Followed by railroad, trucking, airline, Amazon, UPS, Fed Ex, NJ Transit, and postal workers. Gov. declares emergency and mandates that all able bodied men 18 or older report for labor duties. It happened in Germany. It could happen here.

21. The homelessness crisis escalates. A suburban commuter at Princeton Junction station is thrown under  a train by a mentally ill homeless man. Public outrage. Gov. declares emergency and issues emergency rules that mandate that homeless people be rounded up, subject to mental evaluation, and involuntarily committed and housed in concentration camps (something similar already is already happening on the West Coast and Trump called for a much broader program of concentration camps for homeless.)  Courts don’t block this by injunction and the camps are built and populated. Too late now, eh?

22. The NJ business community went ballistic this summer when Murphy DEP Commissioner threatened to adopt emergency flood rules that restricted new development. Flood rules? Can’t they imagine the power DEP would have to impose severe restrictions on existing operations under the “emergency rule” standards allow by the NJ Courts in the bear hunt case?

23. Due to current and projected sea level rise and daily high tide flooding, the DEP declares an “imminent peril” to existing residents of the barrier islands and adopts emergency regulations mandating evacuation and abandonment of property, with condemnation and compensation to follow. Strategic retreat, baby!

This is the kind of stuff that can happen when the NJ Supreme Court abandons its sacred duty to defend Constitutional rights & block State government abuses of power.

The Court just did that to allow DEP to kill bears.

But don’t think that emergency rules can’t kill you too.

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

NJ Supreme Court Chief Justice Rabner Denies Request To Stay Bear Hunt

December 7th, 2022 No comments

Judge Notes Anomaly Of Emergency Rulemaking

Stunning: NJ Supreme Court Fails To Protect Constitutional Due Process Rights

With absolutely no explanation or legal reasoning, and in just one sentence, NJ Supreme Court Chief Justice Rabner just denied the request to stay the bear hunt pending legal appeal of DEP’s emergency rulemaking procedure.

The Supreme Court requested that the appeal be expedited.

Screen Shot 2022-12-07 at 2.22.37 PM (1)

I’m not sure whether additional briefs were filed to the Supreme Court or if the justices relied exclusively on the briefs filed to the Appellate Division and the Appellate Court decision.

It seems to me that one of the tests required to satisfy the burden for an injunction is absurd and impossible to meet: how can a lawyer demonstrate, with “clear and convincing evidence” that there is “well settled law”, when there is no precedent?

Why didn’t the Appellate Division or the Supreme Court conduct “strict scrutiny” and provide no deference to DEP decision-making? How can an injunction proceeding wipe out that judicial standard of review and scrutiny, especially when the Appellate Court acknowledged that there “may be irreparable harm”?

Regardless, although Chief Justice Rabner seems to express concerns for the emergency rulemaking procedure and directed that the appeal be expedited by the Appellate Division, it looks like the hunt will be over and many bears murdered before the case can be argued and decided.

So, sadly, Rabner engaged in a hollow and cynical gesture.

One man should not have this kind of power and because he does, he should use it extremely carefully and be guided by a moral and ethical imperative: “first do no harm”.

Justice Rabner failed that test.

And he completely failed to protect Constitutionally guaranteed due process rights. That is an outrageous legal failure.

[End Note: Why is the Fish and Game Council (FGC) treated like they are the decision-maker here?

The Supreme Court has clearly ruled that the FGC is the child – DEP is the parent.

DEP engaged in “final agency action”, not the FGC.

What am I missing?

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Nevada

December 7th, 2022 Comments off

8H1A2968

8H1A2966

8H1A2976

8H1A2972

8H1A2977

8H1A2970

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

The Appellate Division Just Gave DEP A Blank Check on Regulatory Power

December 6th, 2022 No comments

Court Rejects Challenge To DEP Emergency Rulemaking

Business Groups Will Rue The Day If This Decision Is Not Struck Down By Supreme Court

If DEP can legally do this, they can get away with virtually anything.

The Appellate Division today denied the bear protectors appeal for an injunction to stop the bear hunt, based on DEP’s reliance on an “emergency rule” and finding of “imminent peril”.

The Court found:

The sole issue before this court is whether appellants have demonstrated, by clear and convincing evidence, entitlement to injunctive relief under the factors set forth in Crowe v. DeGioia, 90 N.J. 126, 132-34 (1982), and Garden State Equality v. Dow, 216 N.J. 314, 320 (2013). Because we conclude appellants failed to satisfy these factors, we deny appellants’ motion for a stay and dissolve the interim stay issued pursuant to Rule 2:9-8.

It is an absolutely terrible decision.

The Court completely ignored the legal issues and got diverted and bogged down in the science and policy issues of the hunt. This legal case was about the abuse of power by the executive branch, not the scientific merits or policy of a bear hunt.

(Note: I feared exactly this would happen (Nov. 19 post):

I hope the lawyers for the bear supporters do not get bogged down in the scientific arguments, unreliable data that supports DEP’s determination, and serious flaws in logic in DEP’s emergency declaration and Comprehensive Black Bear Management Plan.

I hope they can stay focused on the Constitutional due process issues and the statutory legal basis for declaration of an emergency, which requires DEP to document an “imminent peril”.)

The Court also focused far too heavily on the Fish and Game Council, and relied on the FGC public hearing to dismiss the due process violations.

The gravamen of appellants’ motion for a stay pending appeal is that “the Council adopted the emergency rules without adequate evidence of imminent peril to the public and exceeded its statutory authority.”

The Court used the FGC sham public hearing to dismiss due process and APA procedural concerns:

Initially, we are not convinced appellants’ right to due process was violated under the APA. Appellants acknowledge they attended the public meeting and provided comment.

But the FGC recommendations are legally meaningless without DEP regulations. There can be no hunt without DEP regulations. DEP can not rely on FGC to satisfy their legal obligations, nor can DEP delegate regulatory power to the FGC.

The DEP emergency regulations are the “final agency action” that was challenged in this case, not the FGC.

The DEP made the “imminent peril” finding. The DEP provided no notice or comment or public hearing. THAT IS THE LEGAL ISSUE!

Under a 2005 Supreme Court decision, DEP is the final decisionmaker and DEP regulations are superior to the FGC powers: see: U.S. SPORTSMEN’S ALLIANCE FOUNDATION; v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION,

the Fish and Game Council’s ability to authorize a bear hunt is subject to the statutory condition precedent of the Commissioner’s earlier approval of the very comprehensive policies governing the propagation of black bears.

Our conclusion regarding the Commissioner’s authority is ineluctable not only because of the approval language but because the entire statutory scheme was intended to create a unified approach to conservation and environmental protection under the authority of the Commissioner.  Although the Fish and Game Council may act without day-to-day veto by the Commissioner, its actions exist within a larger universe of comprehensive environmental policies.   If it does not act in accord with those policies, the Commissioner is empowered to intervene. […]

In the event that comprehensive policies are agreed on and a dispute arises between the Commissioner and the Fish and Game Council over whether a hunt or any other preservation or propagation methodology is justified, the [DEP’s] comprehensive policies will provide the standard for adjudicating the issue. ~~~ NJ Supreme Court

The Court in this case completely deferred to DEP’s judgements about the data and science, instead of focusing on the legal issue pregnant in the DEP’s “imminent peril” finding and the emergency rulemaking procedure.

While courts defer to agency expertise on science and factual issues within their expertise, Courts provide no deference at all to administrative agencies’ legal determinations. This was purely a DEP legal determination. The Court completely misconstrued that legal standard of review.

(Note: I feared exactly this would happen: (Dec. 3 post)

If I could have added one thing, I would have put more meat on the bones of the judicial standard of review. The Council and DEP deserve no judicial deference. The judges can rely on that and be on solid legal ground, without having to fear being attacked as judicial activists and inappropriately over-ruling the science and policy makers.

The Court could find no precedent on emergency rulemaking and instead of analyzing the legal issues, the Court used the lack of precedent to dismiss the legal challenge:

As to the second factor, appellants’ contentions do not rest on well-settled law. Stated another way, although we have upheld previous CBBMPs that were not adopted pursuant to an emergency regulation, see Animal Prot. League of N.J., 423 N.J. Super. at 554-55, the parties have not cited, and our research has not revealed, any authority deciding emergency rulemaking for black bear hunting. Thus, appellants have not demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of success on the merits of their appeal.

Of course there is no “well settled law” and “clear and convincing evidence”– this is the first time DEP relied on emergency rules to kill bears (and the first legal challenge of a DEP or other State agency’s “imminent peril” determination that I am aware of). That establishes an impossible burden to meet for an injunction, when government acts in a novel fashion to violate constitutional rights and statutory mandates.

The Court also seemed to perceive the appellants as animal rights as long time legal obstructionists instead of legitimate legal appellants challenging abuse of government power.

I tried to convince Ray Cantor of the NJ Business and Industry Association to file an Amicus to make these legal issue distinct from the bear hunt policy questions, but he refused to back up the legal threat he made in the recent business community’s letter to Gov. Murphy opposing DEP emergency flood rules.

The business community will rue the day if this decision is allowed to stand and is not appealed and struck down by the NJ Supreme Court.

The business folks won’t always have a former Wall Street friend as Governor and a friendly former corporate lawyer as DEP Commissioner.

A future Commissioner might believe in regulatory power and use it to hold corporations accountable instead of to kill bears.

This will come back to bite them, for sure.

[End Note: I am not naive.

Of course I know that business groups would file lawsuits if DEP ever adopted an emergency rule that regulated them and imposed compliance costs.

Of course I know that NJ courts protect private property and corporate interests to a far greater degree than citizens rights, and would immediately impose an injunction blocking such DEP rules.

And of course I know that the DEP emergency rule would be struck down by the Courts on the subsequent appeal.

This whole fiasco just exposes the hypocrisy and fraud of the law, particularly regarding judicial review and due process concerns, which are enforced by the Courts when corporate interests and private property rights are involved and ignored when the public interest, public goods, or the commons are involved, or when the citizen tries to vindicate those rights.

Categories: Uncategorized Tags: