Quick Quiz: What are the relationships between the pictures? Best reader comment wins a huge prize!!
Hint can be found on lines 22-23: http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2008/Bills/A0500/121_I1.PDF
-
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
-
Meta
Watch your step…
jsta – could you clarify that?
Would you be refering to steps in a Product Lifecycle Assessment?
Or perhaps the steps in a risk assessment?
The best two reasons against a bottle bill:
There are no visible bottles littering that beautiful view, thus no reason for the bill.
There is a successful NJ Business likely to be bankrupted or made uncompetitive by a bottle bill.
Bill, If you want people to recycle bottles, make it easier to recycle. Many towns have such complicated recycling-refuse rules that they are nearly impossible to comply with, so they just through it out in the trash.
Now we have to add our mercury-filled florescent bulbs to the trash too. One step forward, two steps back.
Betternj – I said nothing about recycling and litter was not mentioned on lines 22-23. Please pay attention to text!.
When I was a kid, we had glass milk bottles delivered to our door.
We also had plenty of local well paid US manufacturing jobs.
With respect to mercury, maybe you should consider the level of mercury in fish caught by the gentleman fishing in hte picture I just posted.
Personally, I will just stop buying things in bottles. Don’t buy much bottled stuff anyway, and what is I recycle.
You can bet that the Huttles won’t be hauling their bottles back and forth, rich lawyers that they are. But they’re all too willing to burden working people with this nonsense.
Another burden for the NJ taxpayer.
JerseyOpine – please opine about what kind of world you’d like to live in.
Private caves in Idaho, perhaps?
This ant-tax drum beat get old.
Taxes are the due we pay to live in society.
Got a better plan?
Hmmm… perhaps with continued energy wasted by NOT recycling, and an increase in global warming, the Salem River at this location will be “undersea” and no longer a river, but part of the new ocean floor?
You can send the really huge prize directly to my home.
🙂
How does opposition to a bottle deposit tax translate to living in a private cave in Idaho?
For the record, I am a scrupulous recycler.
I already pay a recycling tax to the county. I do not have a problem with that, I understand that is how the recycling program is funded. Additionally I pay a Recycling tax to my garbage service courtesy of Gov. Corzine (enacted on 01.13.08).
So no, I do not need a third tax for recycling, which I already do very conscientiously.
DING DING DING DING!!!! byramaniac WINS THE PRIZE !!!!!
Yes – glass manufacture consumer huge amounts of energy which is produced by carbon based fossil fuels. Product Lifecycle Assessment shows that – by far – the majority of impacts from glass containers is not disposal or litter, but energy consumption.
The CO2 emitted when producing this energy contributes to global warming.
Global warming is driving – among other things – sea level rise.
This location is just a few feet about sea level and will be inundated!!!,
The Best solution is “source reduction” – to reduce consumption of glass.
The next best option is “reuse” (a form of recycling we do not now employ in NJ, where recycled glass is all crushed and containers are not reused).
Sharply rising oil prices will drive a shift away from petroleum based plastic containers and long range transportation intensive product manufacturing and distribution systems. We may go back to a locally produced and consumed glass based container system.
We better start thinking about and planning for these issues NOW – the crunch is coming – a twofer: global warming and peak oil.
JerseyOpine – a bottle bill can not be dismissed as you did by your comment “Another burden for the NJ taxpayer”
I am glad you support recycling.
We need to move towards the system in Germany – where producers bear more of the burden to pay for and implement a system that focuses further upstream on manufacturing for more efficient use of materials and energy.
Bottle bills can help in that kind of transition.
NJ started heading in this direction in 1990 under new “Source reduction” policy, but that was derained by the Whitman administration due to oppostion by the business community.
DEP has been clueless ever since.
Thye “bottle bill” by itself is onerous. It must be coupled with manufacturers standardizing on a very limited and recyclable family of plastics for their containers.
Right now only two or three types of plastic are accepted for recycling (HDPE, LDPE and PETE). And that varies depending on where you are in the state/country. A lot of plastic still goes to the landfill and with land becoming more and more expensive, recylying will be the better financial deal. Polystyrene is not recycled and yet it’s the material used for foam board insulation.
Glass is a no-brainer. Besides being easy to re-melt into new containers, it works well as an additive to construction materials. Plastics are a petroleum based product, and we all know where that comes from. It take far less energy to re-shape it into other products than it does to formulate the raw material. Same for metal cans.
When recycling first came about years ago, the doom and gloomers hollered about the death of business. The opposite occurred. The idea of recyclng spread into other materials (concrete, asphalt, steel) and businesses actually were born and reduced their operating costs.
Recycling is a culture shift and does not match our ‘merican, party-on-and-toss-it-overboard attitude. We have a choice of accepting this change under our control, or having it shoved down our throats by a changing world.
eyesofsussex – words of wisdom, indeed!
A little off subject but also somewhat relevant… We can’t drink the tap water at home due to a nasty smell and taste so we were doing the bottle (plastic) water thing. Each week the recycling can was filled to the top with these empty plastic water bottles. Several months ago we invested in a water filter that makes the tap water taste pure and clean with no smell. Now the recycling can goes out every two weeks and it still isn’t filled to the top. Also, I no longer need to make a trip to the store to buy the cases of water bottles. A water filter is something all the bottle water drinkers should think about.
I like to see how little trash we can make in a week. I get very happy when I’ve got only one can out front on trash night. It’s the little things…
But one of the biggest problems is the “fast-food” industry. Notice how much waste just one trip through the drive-through produces? And, apparently, Americans need to be told that this food is making them fat too. I guess they thought a trip to McD’s counted as a family dinner.
Pingback: live free webcam sex
Pingback: nike free trainer 1
Pingback: cheap womens nike air max
Pingback: nike roshe run high sneakerboot