But Media Print the Press Releases and Miss the Story (Again)
NJ’s $229 million share of the $60 billion Congressional Sandy bailout appropriated for water infrastructure got a lot of media play and press releases this week (e.g. see:
- Feds to give N.J. $229 million to strengthen Sandy-damaged water and sewage plants
- N.J. to get $229M from EPA for post-Sandy water upgrades
- Lautenberg, Menendez Announce $229 Million in Sandy Aid to Rebuild and Strengthen NJ Water Infrastructure
So I want to take a moment to make a few important points that were ignored in that coverage (readers: please hit the links in this post, there’s a lot of meat there).
First, while Gov. Christie and DEP have issued scores of press releases and done many PR events about Sandy recovery and NJ’s receipt of federal aid, both were curiously silent about this particular $229 million tranch of federal money.
Where was the Gov.? Where was DEP Commissioner Martin?
They don’t want to talk about clean water?
They don’t want to take credit for getting federal money?
Why is that?
Answer: Because they are highly vulnerable.
EPA’s Region 2 Administrator Judy Enck revealed why, i.e. these are not new problems, they were well known and existed long before Sandy hit, but were ignored:
As of now, a project vying for the money must have been affected by Hurricane Sandy, and it must propose fixes that would allow it to withstand future disasters. That includes upgrades such as submersible pumps, backup power sources and barriers to prevent flooding, [EPA Regional Administrator] Enck said.
“As of now”? What? Is that some variant of Obama’s “look forward, not backward”?
Did the world begin anew after Sandy? Is this all down the memory whole via the dismissive phrase “As of now”?
Even the most cursory probe or investigative journalism would reveal that:
1) NJ DEP ignored multiple warnings and performed miserably in preparing for and preventing the severe water infrastructure problems we experienced during Superstorm Sandy;
2) existing DEP emergency planning regulations and permits are weak and unenforceable;
NJ DEP NJPDES regulations (@ NJAC 7:14A-6.12) specify limited emergency planning provisions for certain wastewater treatment facilities, including back up power provision. These are not mandatory enforceable permit conditions and DEP has lax oversight of these important functions.
NJ DEP Water Supply Planning regulations (@ NJAC 7:10-2.3 Plan for provision of potable water in emergencies) task NJ DEP with the responsibility to develop emergency plans for public water supply systems across the state.
On January 24, 2013, DEP denied my OPRA request for these emergency plans that are mandated by DEP’s own regulations.
3) there are no new DEP plans, regulations, enforcement initiatives, or funds for preventing the same problems from occurring – in fact, DEP has effectively deregulated Sandy infrastructure rebuilding;
4) aside from Sandy damage and vulnerability, there are HUGE multi-billion dollar infrastructure deficits and a complete lack of asset management that DEP and BPU are sweeping under the rug; and
5) Failures can be directly tied back to Governor Christie’s policies and Executive Orders!
The second major issue ignored by media and environmental critics is that President Obama CUT the clean water State Revolving Fund by $447 million.
Those cuts are reflected in the Christie FY’14 budget.
3. Clean Water Cuts
At a time when the best evidence from the ASCE Report card concludes that we need to invest $298 billion over the next 20 years for water infrastructure, Obama’s budget proposes to cut $474 million from the State Revolving Fund (SRF) that pays for those investments (this is in addition to prior cuts due to sequestration)
Much more investment is required if adaptation to climate change is considered and infrastructure asset management is changed from a voluntary to a mandatory program.
So why am I the ONLY one to write about the Obama cuts?
Or to expose the fact that praise of EPA is absurd, because EPA had nothing to do with the $229 million, that was a Congressional appropriation.
I’ll praise EPA when they promulgate new regulations (as is adopt them, not propose them, issue exaggerated and self-congratulatory press releases, bask in media and ENGO praise, and then withdraw them a year later) or take enforcement action, not when they hand out money.
Worse, the appropriation was made with few STRINGS attached, i.e. all vulnerable water and sewer facilities are not required conduct vulnerability assessments, asset management plans, and upgrade to prevent future loss. Those requirements apply ONLY to those facilities that were struck by Sandy that request the money – very few of NJ’s vulnerable facilities will be subject to these requirements.
Tom Johnson at NJ Spotlight was the only media to put the story in context (i.e. to mention huge infrastructure deficits) and to include criticism from environmentalists – but even Tom did not mention the Obama cuts or the DEP performance issues (see: Number of the Day – $229 Million)
When a plane crashes, it’s page one news and we spare no resources to conduct detailed investigations to learn why and take steps to fix the problem and prevent a recurrence of whatever failed.
But water and sewer plants fail and we don’t care?
We can live without a plane for a week – try living without water for that long.
JUST FOR YOUR INFORMATION. TOMORROW STATE HOUSE COMMISSION MEETS. 9 AM STATEHOUSE
ABOUT 30 FARM LEASES ARE TO BE APPROVED
MY TAKE IS THESE ARE ON WILDLIFE “MANAGEMENT” AREAS WHICH WERE SAVED FOR DEER AND BIRDS ETC TO LIVE ON. I DONT WANT FARMERS IN THERE.
MY SECOND OPPOSITION IS THAT THE RATES ARE A GIVEAWAY. THE NJ TREASURY LOSES OUT. THIS IS JUST FYI
@jean public
Thanks Jean P. – you should try to give us a heads up and we can prepare and better inform our readers.
For interested readers, here is the May 6 agenda of the State House Commission:
http://www.state.nj.us/treasury/statehouse-commission/pdf/agenda-050613.pdf
Ah, the State House Commission, the very interesting and not easy to access place, the “boundary” where the supposed “common good” of the public, as interpreted by “their” government, meets the private sector of hungry entrepreneurs. A very interesting boundary indeed.
@Bill Neil
Thanks Bill – FYI, I quickly scanned the SHC DEP leases.
There was only 1 I was familiar with, in terms of the underlying facts. And it was WRONG by a factor of 3 TIMES.
BTW, while DEP collects peanuts for utility (gas and oil pipelines, electric power line, etc) across the most sensitive and valuable lands (and under reservoirs) of 15 cents per square foot, the NJ Turnpike Authority gets 8 TImes that for the ROW in Turnpike.
I skiped the meting this morning, but asked Emile DeVito and Jeff Tittel to see if they could correct below.
From: “Bill”
To: senbsmith@njleg.org, sencardinale@njleg.org
Cc: kduhon@njleg.org
Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2013 6:50:33 PM
Subject: SHC May 6 agenda item – error
Senators Smith and Cardinale:
Re: New Business – Agenda Item #21 – Proposed lease of D&R Canal Park to Lambertville MUA
The DEP proposal states that the rate is:
“In accordance with the recommendations of the August 2011 Interagency Lease Task Force Report, the proposed rental rate is $0.05 per square foot with a 2.5% annual escalator.”
However, upon review of the Report, the rate for this type of lease – “Upland corridor – linear project” – is found in Appendix II. That rate is $0.15 per square foot, 3 times the proposed rate.
Could you determine if this is a a typo or a material error and have it corrected?
To confirm, please see:
http://www.njspotlight.com/assets/12/0131/0139
Thank you.
Bill Wolfe,
Director
NJ PEER
@Bill Wolfe
CORRECTION:
oops – I relied on Appendix II and missed the public project rate:
“The recommendations below include a flat rate lease fee of $0.15 per square foot per year for private sector projects and $0.05 per square foot per year for public projects.”