Christie DEP Stands Environmental Justice Policy on Its Head
Christie Policy and Performance Demand Legislative Oversight
We recently wrote about one of NJ’s “sacrifice zones”, Paulsboro NJ, a community in the belly of the toxic spewing petro-chemical beast.
But, as we noted, Paulsboro is NOT alone – there are scores of “sacrifice zones” all across NJ, and they are expanding.
They are expanding as disasters like Superstorm Sandy, lack of investment, home foreclosures, abandonment, austerity social safety net policies, crumbling infrastructure, decrepit and segregated schools, and unemployment devastate low income communities.
The DEP – historically – at least recognized their responsibility for addressing the environmental and public health aspects of these problems and struggled to provide relief. Those efforts fell far short and were often more PR spin than substantive reform, but, at least the problems were openly acknowledged and discussed, leadership cared, and DEP resources were committed.
In December 2009, it seemed that DEP had finally turned the corner and could no longer deny the magnitude of the cumulative impact, disproportionate burden, public health, and environmental justice problems. DEP researchers released a report that documented the problem – see: DEP Discovers Discrimination – Dumps Environmental Justice Issue in Christie’s Lap.
So, what did the Christie DEP do with that challenge the Corzine DEP belatedly dumped in their lap?
They ran for the hills and spun a lot of bullshit –like this
The Next Generation of Environmental Management
“Working with Communities to Address their Greatest Environmental Concerns”
- Goal 3 – Restoration and Enhanced Protection in Environmentally Overburdened Communities
- Develop a new paradigm for the protection of communities overburdened by environmental stresses through a multimedia approach focusing on human health and the environmental impacts; ensure that we work in concert to address issues related to air, water, preservation, acquisition, and affordable access to parks.
- Continued development and utilization of the Cumulative Impact Method.
- Ensure cross program coordination to achieve the greatest net-environmental gain or the least possible negative effect impacting the public’s quality of life.
- Expand the number of DEP staff dedicated to working in and with communities to ensure a thorough understanding of issues and potential solutions.
Paulsboro, and Pompton Lakes, and Camden, and Passaic City, and Garfield and Kearny and Trenton and Gloucester City and Salem and Carney’s Point and Neptune and Clifton and West Orange and Linden, and Paterson, and Carteret and Middlesex and Elizabeth and Newark and Doremus Ave. – the list goes on – they all make a mockery of DEP’s “overburdened” community rhetoric (see DEP’s Office of Environmental Justice).
The people of Paulsboro are literally a laboratory for an “over-burdened community” and a case study in what is known as “cumulative impacts”.
But DEP has virtually abandoned the science and the development of regulatory standards to address cumulative impacts and cumulative risks – they default to US EPA. The DEP’s website cites EPA studies that are more than 10 years old!
Towards Cumulative Risk Assessment
EPA Cumulative Assessment Information
This website offers presentations made during the EPA “Mid-Atlantic Cumulative Risk Workshop” held on May 28-29, 2003. The workshop’s theme was “How Can Cumulative Risk Assessment be Used to Achieve Environmental Justice?” Attendees included Public Health Experts, Scientists, Environmental Justice Advocates, and Government Officials. Discussion focused on: defining cumulative Risk and the intersections between cumulative risk and public health.Risk World
A listing of databases regarding risk assessment, analysis, and managementA List of Risk Assessment Values References (Scorecard)
As we’ve written, DEP Commissioner Martin has established a de facto moratorium on development of new regulatory standards.
DEP science has been outsourced, suppressed, ignored, spun, or defunded.
Let’s hope that these issues get some legislative oversight in DEP’s upcoming budget hearing before the Senate on April 15.
Pingback: fitflop salg
Pingback: Roger Vivier flats
Pingback: cheap wow gold
Pingback: fitflop
Pingback: lululemon outlet
Pingback: louis vuitton outlet
Pingback: Christian Louboutin replica
Pingback: giuseppe zanotti outlet
Pingback: Lululemon Canada online
Pingback: ray ban sunglasses replica
Pingback: ray ban sunglasses outlet
Pingback: lululemon canada outlet
Pingback: Replica RayBan Wayfarer
Pingback: lululemon pants
Pingback: cheap ray ban sunglasses
Pingback: giuseppe zanotti outlet
Pingback: Christian Louboutin Replica
Pingback: Roger Vivier shoes
Pingback: ray ban sunglasses outlet
Pingback: http://www.qim.com/artistes/louboutin.asp
Pingback: nike free run size 12
Pingback: lululemon canada
Pingback: nike blazers kids
Pingback: Cheap Christian Louboutin
Pingback: fitflop pas cher
Pingback: مؤسسة تنظيف بالرياض
Pingback: garcinia cambogia reviews
Pingback: Burberry Sale
Pingback: nike free 3.0 discontinued
Pingback: nike factory store outlet
Pingback: nike roshe run mesh
Pingback: nike air max 90 finish line
Pingback: nike roshe run mens sale uk
Pingback: pay4you
Pingback: kids nike outlet
Pingback: crmkxfksgdafagafhdjkshgeyug
Pingback: HOGAN Outlet
Pingback: WolfeNotes.com » Murphy DEP Cynically Spins Allocation of Green Acres Funds To Cover For Failure To Implement “Historic” Environmental Justice Law