More than 2 years after Sandy, serious problems remain
beach is closed at the Christie Sea Wall Folly. The politicians don’t want you to see the mess they’ve made of the beach. (Mantoloking, NJ – 1/17/15)
A cloudless crisp 25 degree January Saturday morning prompted the dog and I to take a trip to check out the shore – what we saw:
Driving over the ridge of the Rt. 528 bridge and coming down into Mantoloking, looking out towards the beach, we were jarred by a huge ugly scar along the oceanfront – the King Canute $40 million Seawall (photo above).
As we wrote (see: Christie’s Sea Wall Follies:
“Here is what Gov. Christie’s own Hazard Mitigation Plan says about sea walls – they don’t work and make erosion problems worse:
Historically, some of the methods used by municipalities and property owners to stop or slow down coastal erosion or shoreline change have actually exacerbated the problem. Attempting to halt the natural process of erosion with shore parallel or perpendicular structures such as seawalls (groins and jetties) and other hard structures typically worsens the erosion in front of the structure (i.e. walls), prevents or starves any sediment behind the structure (groins) from supplying down-drift properties with sediment, and subjects down-drift beaches to increased erosion. Since most sediment transport associated with erosion and longshore drift has been reduced, some of the State’s greatest assets and attractions – beaches, dunes, barrier beaches, salt marshes, and estuaries – are threatened and will slowly disappear as the sediment sources that feed and sustain them are eliminated.
Sandy barrier/bluff coastlines are constantly changing as the result of wind, currents, storms, and sea-level rise. Because of this, developed sandy shorelines are often stabilized with hardened structures (seawalls, bulkheads, revetments, rip-rap, gabions, and groins) to protect coastal properties from erosion. While hardened structures typically prove to be beneficial in reducing property damage, the rate of coastal erosion typically increases near stabilization structures. This increased erosion impacts natural habitats, spawning grounds, recreational activity areas, and public access (Frizzera 2011). Table 5.2-1 summarizes the number and type of NJDEP shoreline structures off the coastline of New Jersey along the Atlantic Ocean and Inland Bays (current as of 1993). (Chapter 5.2)
We waited at the traffic light of the intersection of Rt 35 for what seemed like 5 minutes, because the road there is still under construction and limited to one lane. And this was on a winter Saturday morning with little traffic.
As I waited, I had plenty of time to read the HUGE SIGN posted by DEP about the “resilience” sea wall project. I was reminded of the scene “Now which way do we go?” Scarecrow from the Wizard of Oz. Almost expected to see DEP Commissioner Martin do his scarecrow skit.
We parked the car by the Mantoloking Fire Station and set out for the beach, where we were assaulted by another sign: (see above photo).
Disregarding that warning, we took a stroll north along the beach to the northern tip of the sea wall, then reversed course south for about 2 miles. We especially wanted to look at the Canute Sea Wall. We spoke to a few longtime residents out for a walk on the beach.
Our observations can be found in the photo captions:
this is the northern tip of the sea wall
- a long time 30+ year resident told us that full moon high tides and nor’easters run right up to the sea wall and wash out all the sand. “It’s pretty scary” she said.
boie inspects King Canute’s sea wall – highly erosive, he barked!
sand at base of sea wall regularly washes out. Bulldozers constantly replace it.
the beach was narrow, maybe 75 feet, and steeply sloping. I asked a couple out walking their dog about how badly the beach was doing. “They’ll fix it” the man replied, as If the erosion problems were simple car repair.
these are not dunes, they don’t function like natural dunes, and they are very ugly, no?
this is what vulnerability and a huge boondoggle look like – that pile of sand will soon wash out.
but despite vulnerability, still they build more castles in the sand
this is a JCP&L substation in a low lying area along Rt. 35. It is vulnerable to coastal and back bay flooding. No changes appear to have been made to reduce vulnerability.
Rt 35, looking north. Where’s the bike lane? That yellow marker on the right, by the sidewalk, is a natural gas line. Those pipes are vulnerable and fed fires in wake of Sandy.
Returning to the car, we headed south to Island Beach State Park – we don’t know the Rt. 35 construction schedule, but we had assumed that there would be a full court press to get the work done before the spring season and to minimize disruption for residents and businesses. We also thought that $250 million would pay for work on Saturdays.
Here’s what we saw there:
wide sandy beaches and natural dunes at LBI SP
natural dunes protect boardwalk & development, which is set back from the ocean at Seaside Park
a fellow sly fox who didn’t pay the $5 entrance fee at LBI SP
Rt. 35 Seaside Park – one would think $250 million would pay for work on Saturday.
Given the relative silence of New Jersey’s environmentalists other than Surfrider, what can be done to encourage alternatives to the status quo that you have so eloquently described?
Michael Drake
@Drake
We need a bunch of things:
1) I think we need to shame the coastal groups, who clearly know better but are silent because they are taking state funds, into speaking out to educate the public and the press and activate their members.
2) Same goes for the transportation/bicycle/pedestrian friendly advocates and the planning advocates like NJ Future and Sustainable NJ, who are also either playing the inside game with the Christie administration or are co-opted or corrupt.
3) Same goes for the academics, coastal geologists, and and professional planners and engineers.
If these three groups could get on the same page, we could win the public debate and force policy change.
In addition calling out the Christie Administration’s incompetence and “rebuild madness”, we also need to pressure the Obama Administration – HUD, the USACE, USFWS, NOAA, and EPA could all put conditions on federal funds and do a much better job.
Obama’s Executive Order on Climate Change Adaptation lays out a framework – the federal agencies ned to implement it.
Pingback: hiprolean x-s high strength reviews
Pingback: Homepage
Pingback: Scott Yancey
Pingback: Scott Yancey
Pingback: Scott Yancey Review
Pingback: Scott Yancey
Pingback: Scott Yancey
Pingback: Scott Yancey
Pingback: Scott Yancey
Pingback: Scott Yancey
Pingback: Scott Yancey
Pingback: Scott Yancey
Pingback: Scott Yancey Review
Pingback: Scott Yancey Review
Pingback: Scott Yancey
Pingback: Scott Yancey Review
Pingback: Scott Yancey Review
Pingback: Scott Yancey Review
Pingback: Scott Yancey Review
Pingback: Scott Yancey
Pingback: Scott Yancey
Pingback: Scott Yancey Review
Pingback: Scott Yancey
Pingback: Scott Yancey Review
Pingback: Scott Yancey
Pingback: Scott Yancey Review
Pingback: Scott Yancey
Pingback: Scott Yancey Review
Pingback: Scott Yancey Review
Pingback: Scott Yancey Review
Pingback: Scott Yancey Review
Pingback: Scott Yancey Review
Pingback: Scott Yancey
Pingback: Scott Yancey Review
Pingback: Scott Yancey
Pingback: Scott Yancey
Pingback: Scott Yancey
Pingback: Scott Yancey Review
Pingback: Scott Yancey
Pingback: Scott Yancey
Pingback: Scott Yancey Review
Pingback: Scott Yancey
Pingback: Scott Yancey
Pingback: Scott Yancey
Pingback: Scott Yancey
Pingback: Scott Yancey
Pingback: Scott Yancey
Pingback: Scott Yancey Review