EPA Obfuscates and Evades Responsibility for Controversial Dupont Vapor Intrusion Decision

“THE WIZARD OF OZ HAS SPOKEN!”

As I’ve written, the Dupont corporation has petitioned US EPA Region 2 to amend their RCRA Corrective Action cleanup permit at the Pompton Lakes site to raise the vapor intrusion screening levels.

The Dupont request is pending EPA decision. If Dupont were smart, they would withdraw the request and apologize and move on.

[Similarly, at the outset, at a minimum, EPA should have publicly expressed reservations about weakening any protections and then very specifically said that any changes requested by Dupont would require formal public participation requirements under EPA RCRA regulations. That is the absolute minimum. Why does EPA consistently mishandle issues and defer to Dupont? Why do they consistently walk on eggshells when it comes to Dupont? Are they afraid of doing the right thing? Are they just following orders? What explains EPA’s reluctance to speak clearly publicly?]

If Dupont does not withdraw the request, EPA will have to make a hugely controversial decision – EPA can’t duck. It’s a “which side are you on” “the whole world is watching” kind of moment. Something’s gotta give.

[Pete Seeger has the iconic version – but I like the angry edge in Billy Bragg, a voice that is cruelly ironic at a time when the NJ DEP is run by a Thatcherite -and in Washington, we’re still waiting for that Great Leap Forward.]

That Dupont request would weaken health protections for the people of Pompton Lakes and is strongly opposed by the community.

The issue has gotten focused media coverage, see:

As reported, angry residents have written to US EPA Regional Administrator Judith Enck to oppose the Dupont request.

EPA has replied. Sort of.

I was just sent Enck’s reply, sent to residents via a June 26 email from a low level EPA R2 staffer. Is Regional Administrator Enck ducking the decision?

Frankly, I was disgusted with the EPA reply, particularly this “THE WIZARD OF OZ HAS SPOKEN!” edict:

“The EPA and NJDEP are currently reviewing DuPont’s draft 2014 vapor intrusion work plan.  Once EPA and NJDEP complete their review, any changes to DuPont’s vapor intrusion program will be communicated to the community by EPA, NJDEP and DuPont.”

Notice how EPA fails to accurately state the controlling law governing “Dupont’s draft 2014 vapor intrusion work plan”.

Note how EPA points the bureaucratic finger and seeks to share responsibility with NJ DEP, as if this were a Committee decision and no one is in charge.

But more importantly, notice the arrogance in how “any changes” “will be communicated to the community” – what?

Will Dupont send a courier pigeon?

Here is how I advised residents to respond to this arrogant bureaucratic obfuscation:

Write a letter and issue a press release that says the following:
 
1) the Dupont site is being cleaned up under a federal law called RCRA, specifically the Corrective Action program;
 
2) The RCRA CA program is the responsibility of US EPA under federal law;
 
3) the State of NJ and DEP has NOT received delegation of the RCRA CA program from US EPA;
 
4) thus far, the Dupont cleanup has been implemented under a RCRA CA permit issued by US EPA;
 
5) any substantive changes to the Dupont RCRA CA permit require public notice, opportunity for public comment, and a public hearing, under federal law and EPA regulations;
 
6) A change to the vapor intrusion screening levels in the Dupont RCRA CA permit would be highly substantive and trigger formal permit modification procedures under federal law and EPA regulations;
 
7) In the event that EPA decides to amend the Dupont RCRA permit to change the VI screening levels, that change must be done formally via permit modification procedures, which include a public notice, opportunity for public comment, and a public hearing;
 
8) We are very concerned that EPA is obfuscating these issues by creating the appearance that the NJ DEP changes to NJ’s State program are somehow binding on EPA
 
9) We are very concerned that EPA is misleading the public by not advising the public about the legal requirements under RCRA outlined above.
 
(EPA’s letter calls the Dupont VI “screening levels” “comparison levels” – EPA cant even use the correct terminology? Does EPA think we are stupid? EPA condescends, misleads, and insults us.);
 
10) Obfuscation and misleading statements are totally unacceptable and we demand better.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

881 Responses to EPA Obfuscates and Evades Responsibility for Controversial Dupont Vapor Intrusion Decision

  1. Pingback: psv thuisshirt jubileum

  2. Pingback: montre guess homme

  3. Pingback: comprar camisetas de futbol originales baratas en chile

  4. Pingback: Free Run 5.0

  5. Pingback: maillot short manchester city 2013

  6. Pingback: marathon camisetas de barcelona 2014

  7. Pingback: fc schalke 4 trikot kaufen

  8. Pingback: segunda camiseta del borussia dortmund

  9. Pingback: camisa brasil 2013 preta

  10. Pingback: camiseta oficial de barcelona de ecuador 2013

  11. Pingback: manchester city new jersey 2014

  12. Pingback: maillot de manchester city manche longue

  13. Pingback: la camiseta del chelsea 2014

  14. Pingback: ray ban sale online

  15. Pingback: new man utd shirt 2014 15

  16. Pingback: deutschland trikot 2010 kindergr??e

  17. Pingback: Nike Run Homme

  18. Pingback: fotos de la camiseta del juventus

  19. Pingback: breitling watches uk

  20. Pingback: nike roshe run print uk

  21. Pingback: real madrid kit 2014 away

  22. Pingback: venta camisetas inter movistar

  23. Pingback: camiseta del real madrid 2014 cr7

  24. Pingback: fellaini trikot belgien

  25. Pingback: camiseta barcelona 2012 nike colombia

  26. Pingback: tottenham hotspur holsten jersey

  27. Pingback: http://coroer.dk/default.php?Hazard-TrC3B8je Arsenal Kinder AuswC3A4rtstrikot 2014 15

  28. Pingback: fc bayern heimtrikot 2015

  29. Pingback: real madrid t shirt 2014 uk

  30. Pingback: arsenal new away kits 2013

  31. Pingback: real madrid third jersey adizero

  32. Pingback: maillots belgique 2015

  33. Pingback: maillot de foot argentine exterieur

  34. Pingback: hogan outlet sito ufficiale

  35. Pingback: ray bans womens

  36. Pingback: outlet hogan marche

  37. Pingback: vier sterne am bayern trikot

  38. Pingback: hogan interactive

  39. Pingback: hogan rebel outlet online

  40. Pingback: outlet hogan toscana

  41. Pingback: Wholesale NFL Jerseys

  42. Pingback: chelsea third away kit 2012

  43. Pingback: 2014 air max

  44. Pingback: prada outlet

  45. Pingback: maillot psg marseille cauet

  46. Pingback: hogan donna

  47. Pingback: hogan interactive uomo

  48. Pingback: liverpool jersey white blue

  49. Pingback: jersey arsenal untuk bayi

  50. Pingback: hogan rebel uomo

Leave a Reply