EPA Obfuscates and Evades Responsibility for Controversial Dupont Vapor Intrusion Decision

“THE WIZARD OF OZ HAS SPOKEN!”

As I’ve written, the Dupont corporation has petitioned US EPA Region 2 to amend their RCRA Corrective Action cleanup permit at the Pompton Lakes site to raise the vapor intrusion screening levels.

The Dupont request is pending EPA decision. If Dupont were smart, they would withdraw the request and apologize and move on.

[Similarly, at the outset, at a minimum, EPA should have publicly expressed reservations about weakening any protections and then very specifically said that any changes requested by Dupont would require formal public participation requirements under EPA RCRA regulations. That is the absolute minimum. Why does EPA consistently mishandle issues and defer to Dupont? Why do they consistently walk on eggshells when it comes to Dupont? Are they afraid of doing the right thing? Are they just following orders? What explains EPA’s reluctance to speak clearly publicly?]

If Dupont does not withdraw the request, EPA will have to make a hugely controversial decision – EPA can’t duck. It’s a “which side are you on” “the whole world is watching” kind of moment. Something’s gotta give.

[Pete Seeger has the iconic version – but I like the angry edge in Billy Bragg, a voice that is cruelly ironic at a time when the NJ DEP is run by a Thatcherite -and in Washington, we’re still waiting for that Great Leap Forward.]

That Dupont request would weaken health protections for the people of Pompton Lakes and is strongly opposed by the community.

The issue has gotten focused media coverage, see:

As reported, angry residents have written to US EPA Regional Administrator Judith Enck to oppose the Dupont request.

EPA has replied. Sort of.

I was just sent Enck’s reply, sent to residents via a June 26 email from a low level EPA R2 staffer. Is Regional Administrator Enck ducking the decision?

Frankly, I was disgusted with the EPA reply, particularly this “THE WIZARD OF OZ HAS SPOKEN!” edict:

“The EPA and NJDEP are currently reviewing DuPont’s draft 2014 vapor intrusion work plan.  Once EPA and NJDEP complete their review, any changes to DuPont’s vapor intrusion program will be communicated to the community by EPA, NJDEP and DuPont.”

Notice how EPA fails to accurately state the controlling law governing “Dupont’s draft 2014 vapor intrusion work plan”.

Note how EPA points the bureaucratic finger and seeks to share responsibility with NJ DEP, as if this were a Committee decision and no one is in charge.

But more importantly, notice the arrogance in how “any changes” “will be communicated to the community” – what?

Will Dupont send a courier pigeon?

Here is how I advised residents to respond to this arrogant bureaucratic obfuscation:

Write a letter and issue a press release that says the following:
 
1) the Dupont site is being cleaned up under a federal law called RCRA, specifically the Corrective Action program;
 
2) The RCRA CA program is the responsibility of US EPA under federal law;
 
3) the State of NJ and DEP has NOT received delegation of the RCRA CA program from US EPA;
 
4) thus far, the Dupont cleanup has been implemented under a RCRA CA permit issued by US EPA;
 
5) any substantive changes to the Dupont RCRA CA permit require public notice, opportunity for public comment, and a public hearing, under federal law and EPA regulations;
 
6) A change to the vapor intrusion screening levels in the Dupont RCRA CA permit would be highly substantive and trigger formal permit modification procedures under federal law and EPA regulations;
 
7) In the event that EPA decides to amend the Dupont RCRA permit to change the VI screening levels, that change must be done formally via permit modification procedures, which include a public notice, opportunity for public comment, and a public hearing;
 
8) We are very concerned that EPA is obfuscating these issues by creating the appearance that the NJ DEP changes to NJ’s State program are somehow binding on EPA
 
9) We are very concerned that EPA is misleading the public by not advising the public about the legal requirements under RCRA outlined above.
 
(EPA’s letter calls the Dupont VI “screening levels” “comparison levels” – EPA cant even use the correct terminology? Does EPA think we are stupid? EPA condescends, misleads, and insults us.);
 
10) Obfuscation and misleading statements are totally unacceptable and we demand better.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

881 Responses to EPA Obfuscates and Evades Responsibility for Controversial Dupont Vapor Intrusion Decision

  1. Pingback: nike roshe run slip on męskie

  2. Pingback: nike roshe run dyn fw męskie

  3. Pingback: camisetas u de chile ni?os

  4. Pingback: nike roshe run hyperfuse damskie

  5. Pingback: que marca es la camiseta del real madrid

  6. Pingback: Buty Nike Air Force 1

  7. Pingback: nike roshe run mesh męskie

  8. Pingback: Nike Air Max + 2013 Damskie

  9. Pingback: Buty Nike Air Max Damskie

  10. Pingback: nike roshe run pattern męskie

  11. Pingback: Nike Air Max 90 Damskie

  12. Pingback: nike roshe run kpu damskie

  13. Pingback: nike roshe run slip on damskie

  14. Pingback: buy personalised chelsea fc shirt

  15. Pingback: que numero de camiseta lleva messi

  16. Pingback: camiseta de chile para brasil 2014

  17. Pingback: camiseta real espa?a honduras 2013

  18. Pingback: camisetas de sleeping with sirens ecuador

  19. Pingback: segunda camiseta de alemania 2014

  20. Pingback: bayern m锟斤拷nchen trikot chronik

  21. Pingback: psg shirt 2012 13 uk

  22. Pingback: away shirt real madrid

  23. Pingback: camisa comemorativa flamengo copa do brasil

  24. Pingback: gareth bale camiseta real madrid ni?o

  25. Pingback: t shirts of real madrid

  26. Pingback: camiseta argentina mundial 1990

  27. Pingback: david luiz brazil soccer jersey

  28. Pingback: manchester city jersey 2014 black

  29. Pingback: jag

  30. Pingback: trikot chelsea london

  31. Pingback: fc bayern munchen jerseys

  32. Pingback: camisa seleo italia feminina

  33. Pingback: fc bayern trikot 2013 schwarz

  34. Pingback: camisetas tecnicas personalizadas barcelona

  35. Pingback: ブランドスーパーコピー

  36. Pingback: mbt soldes

  37. Pingback: seleccion argentina de futbol camiseta

  38. Pingback: como hacer la camiseta del borussia dortmund pes 2014

  39. Pingback: barcelona messi jersey 3x

  40. Pingback: maillot de foot de chelsea

  41. Pingback: trikot schalke 13 14

  42. Pingback: bayern munich black jersey 2012

  43. Pingback: spain home soccer jersey

  44. Pingback: ray ban briller

  45. Pingback: wm trikot 2014 portugal kaufen

  46. Pingback: nike air max 2011 wholesale

  47. Pingback: camisetas francia mundial 2014

  48. Pingback: personalizar la camiseta del real madrid

  49. Pingback: cheap nike air max trainers uk

  50. Pingback: camisetas seleccion espa?ola portero

Leave a Reply