EPA Obfuscates and Evades Responsibility for Controversial Dupont Vapor Intrusion Decision

“THE WIZARD OF OZ HAS SPOKEN!”

As I’ve written, the Dupont corporation has petitioned US EPA Region 2 to amend their RCRA Corrective Action cleanup permit at the Pompton Lakes site to raise the vapor intrusion screening levels.

The Dupont request is pending EPA decision. If Dupont were smart, they would withdraw the request and apologize and move on.

[Similarly, at the outset, at a minimum, EPA should have publicly expressed reservations about weakening any protections and then very specifically said that any changes requested by Dupont would require formal public participation requirements under EPA RCRA regulations. That is the absolute minimum. Why does EPA consistently mishandle issues and defer to Dupont? Why do they consistently walk on eggshells when it comes to Dupont? Are they afraid of doing the right thing? Are they just following orders? What explains EPA’s reluctance to speak clearly publicly?]

If Dupont does not withdraw the request, EPA will have to make a hugely controversial decision – EPA can’t duck. It’s a “which side are you on” “the whole world is watching” kind of moment. Something’s gotta give.

[Pete Seeger has the iconic version – but I like the angry edge in Billy Bragg, a voice that is cruelly ironic at a time when the NJ DEP is run by a Thatcherite -and in Washington, we’re still waiting for that Great Leap Forward.]

That Dupont request would weaken health protections for the people of Pompton Lakes and is strongly opposed by the community.

The issue has gotten focused media coverage, see:

As reported, angry residents have written to US EPA Regional Administrator Judith Enck to oppose the Dupont request.

EPA has replied. Sort of.

I was just sent Enck’s reply, sent to residents via a June 26 email from a low level EPA R2 staffer. Is Regional Administrator Enck ducking the decision?

Frankly, I was disgusted with the EPA reply, particularly this “THE WIZARD OF OZ HAS SPOKEN!” edict:

“The EPA and NJDEP are currently reviewing DuPont’s draft 2014 vapor intrusion work plan.  Once EPA and NJDEP complete their review, any changes to DuPont’s vapor intrusion program will be communicated to the community by EPA, NJDEP and DuPont.”

Notice how EPA fails to accurately state the controlling law governing “Dupont’s draft 2014 vapor intrusion work plan”.

Note how EPA points the bureaucratic finger and seeks to share responsibility with NJ DEP, as if this were a Committee decision and no one is in charge.

But more importantly, notice the arrogance in how “any changes” “will be communicated to the community” – what?

Will Dupont send a courier pigeon?

Here is how I advised residents to respond to this arrogant bureaucratic obfuscation:

Write a letter and issue a press release that says the following:
 
1) the Dupont site is being cleaned up under a federal law called RCRA, specifically the Corrective Action program;
 
2) The RCRA CA program is the responsibility of US EPA under federal law;
 
3) the State of NJ and DEP has NOT received delegation of the RCRA CA program from US EPA;
 
4) thus far, the Dupont cleanup has been implemented under a RCRA CA permit issued by US EPA;
 
5) any substantive changes to the Dupont RCRA CA permit require public notice, opportunity for public comment, and a public hearing, under federal law and EPA regulations;
 
6) A change to the vapor intrusion screening levels in the Dupont RCRA CA permit would be highly substantive and trigger formal permit modification procedures under federal law and EPA regulations;
 
7) In the event that EPA decides to amend the Dupont RCRA permit to change the VI screening levels, that change must be done formally via permit modification procedures, which include a public notice, opportunity for public comment, and a public hearing;
 
8) We are very concerned that EPA is obfuscating these issues by creating the appearance that the NJ DEP changes to NJ’s State program are somehow binding on EPA
 
9) We are very concerned that EPA is misleading the public by not advising the public about the legal requirements under RCRA outlined above.
 
(EPA’s letter calls the Dupont VI “screening levels” “comparison levels” – EPA cant even use the correct terminology? Does EPA think we are stupid? EPA condescends, misleads, and insults us.);
 
10) Obfuscation and misleading statements are totally unacceptable and we demand better.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

881 Responses to EPA Obfuscates and Evades Responsibility for Controversial Dupont Vapor Intrusion Decision

  1. Pingback: hogan h198

  2. Pingback: cheap christian louboutin

  3. Pingback: camisa do real madrid cristiano ronaldo 7

  4. Pingback: messi t shirt barcelona

  5. Pingback: scarpe hogan uomo online

  6. Pingback: real madrid trikot intersport

  7. Pingback: cheap toms

  8. Pingback: hogan scontate

  9. Pingback: ray ban womens glasses

  10. Pingback: hogan prezzi

  11. Pingback: hogan milano

  12. Pingback: neymar numero maillot barcelone

  13. Pingback: Men's Nike San Francisco 49ers 16 Joe Montana Limited Team Alternate Two Tone Super Bowl XLVII NFL Jersey

  14. Pingback: buy liverpool shirt 14 15

  15. Pingback: Sweat Blog

  16. Pingback: 牍岉姼鞚胳潉 頃橃 鞎婌潉 瓯半┐ 鞚措彊鞚?臧€電ロ暅 頂勲Μ 鞀ろ儬霐╉槙鞚?靹犿儩頃橁卑雮?牍岉姼鞚?鞝滍拡鞐?頂勲爤鞛勳潉 攵欖棳 臧€鞀る爤鞚胳 鞛愲Μ鞐?雴撿溂氅?霅滊嫟. 鞏措

  17. Pingback: 銉°兗銉究閫佹枡鐒℃枡 姘寸潃 銉撱偔銉?姘寸潃銈枫儳銉笺儎 鍗樺搧銉撱偔銉?銉撱偔銉嬨儨銉堛儬 涓?銉溿儓銉?銉撱偔銉嬨儜銉炽儎 姘寸潃鍗樺搧 銉戙兂銉?銉撱偔銉嬪崢鍝?銉溿儓銉犲崢

  18. Pingback: 泻褍锌懈褌褜 芯写薪芯褌芯薪薪邪褟 写械褌褋泻邪褟 褎褍褌斜芯谢泻邪 锌芯 薪械写芯褉芯谐芯泄 褑械薪械. 褎褍褌斜芯谢泻懈 懈 屑邪泄泻懈 写谢褟 屑邪谢褜褔懈泻芯胁 芯褌 芯写械卸写邪

  19. Pingback: 泻褍锌懈褌褜 泻芯褋褌褞屑 褌褍薪懈泻褍 褋 褞斜泻芯泄 芯锌褌芯屑 懈 胁 褉芯蟹薪懈褑褍 芯褌 懈薪褌械褉薪械褌 屑邪谐邪蟹懈薪邪 褝胁械谢懈薪邪 胁 芯写械褋褋械. 写芯褋褌邪胁泻邪 锌

  20. Pingback: 讟讬讜诇讜谉 诇转讬谞讜拽 诪讙讬诇 诇讬讚讛 讗讜诇讟专讛 拽讜诪驻拽讟讬 jet 注诐 讗讬砖讜专 注诇讬讛 诇诪讟讜住 诪讛讚讜专讛 诪讬讜讞讚转 讻讞讜诇 orkney 住讬诇讘专 拽专讜住 silver

  21. Pingback: 卸械谢褌邪褟 屑邪褌芯胁邪褟 泻芯卸邪 锌懈褌芯薪邪. 褝泻蟹芯褌懈褔械褋泻邪褟 薪邪褌褍褉邪谢褜薪邪褟 泻芯卸邪. 泻芯卸邪 蟹屑械懈 泻褍锌懈褌褜 薪邪 褟褉屑邪褉泻械 屑邪褋褌械褉芯

  22. Pingback: 诪砖诇讜讞 讞讬谞诐 讗讜驻谞讛 驻诇讟驻讜专诪转 住谞讚诇讬 2014 谞砖讬诐 讞讚砖讜转 谞注诇讬讬诐 诪砖讗讘讜转 砖诪谞诪谉 注拽讘讬诐 讙讘讜讛讬诐 讞讙讜专讛 诇讘谞讛 谞注诇讬讬

  23. Pingback: 1 賯胤毓 45 爻賳鬲賷賲鬲乇 丕賱禺丕氐丞 賲丕噩賷賰 賱毓亘丞 丕賱卮賲爻 夭賴乇丞 丕賱賯胤賷賮丞 兀賱毓丕亘 賲丨卮賵丞 丿賲賷丞 丕賱爻鬲丕卅乇 丕賱賲賳夭賱 丕賱丿賷賰賵乇 夭賮丕

  24. Pingback: 1 賯胤毓丞 賯賱賲 丨亘乇 噩丕賮 兀丿丕丞 丕賱賯乇胤丕爻賷丞 丕賱廿亘丿丕毓賷丞 賲賮賰 丨丕賰賲 賲爻鬲賵賶 丕賱賰丨賵賱 丕賱賰乇丞 丕賱賯賱賲 賲鬲毓丿丿丞 丕賱賵馗丕卅賮 丕賱賲

  25. Pingback: 2 賮賷 1 爻賱亘賷丞 兀賷賵賳 丕爻鬲賯丕賲丞 亘賰乇丕鬲 丕賱卮毓乇 丕賱丨丿賷丿 賲賵噩丞 噩賴丕夭 賮乇丿 賱賱卮毓乇 賲賳 丕賱爻賷乇丕賲賷賰 丕賱鬲丨賰賲 賮賷 丿乇噩丞 丕賱丨乇丕

  26. Pingback: 2.4G RC 专讻讘 讘诪讛讬专讜转 讙讘讜讛讛 砖诇讟 专讞讜拽 RC 诪专讜爪讬 诪讻讜谞讬讜转 注诐 360 讝拽讜祝 专讜讟专讬 砖诇讟 专讞讜拽 诪讻讜谞讬转 讬诇讚讬诐 爪注爪讜注 砖诪讞 chritmas

  27. Pingback: 賯丕亘爻 賵丕賷 賮丕賷 匕賰賷 賲賯亘爻 丕賱胤丕賯丞 丕賱鬲亘丿賷賱 APP 毓賳 亘毓丿 賲丐賯鬲 鬲丨賰賲 毓賳 亘購毓丿 兀鬲賲鬲丞 丕賱賲賳夭賱 丕賱匕賰賷 賲賯亘爻 丕賱胤丕賯丞 丕賱

  28. Pingback: 讗讜驻谞讬讬诐 诇专讻讘 讗诇讞讜讟讬 诪转谞驻讞 诪砖讗讘转 12V 谞讬讬讚 诇专讻讘 讗讜讜讬专 诪砖讗讘讜转 讞砖诪诇讬 讛爪诪讬讙讬诐 诇砖注讛 讛专讬 讗讜驻谞讬 诇驻讟讜专 讗讘讝

  29. Pingback: 濂虫€уコ銇瓙鑺辨焺銉偆銉夈儶銉犮儙銉冦儓楂儠銉笺儣銉兗銉椼儤銈儛銉炽儔銈儊銉ャ兗銈枫儯銉樸偄銈偗銈汇偟銉兗銉樸儍銉夈儛銉炽儔銉樸偄銈偗銈汇偟銉兗娲楅

  30. Pingback: 爻丕毓丞 賲毓氐賲 丕賱賲賵囟丞 es 賱賱賳爻丕亍 爻丕毓丞 賲毓氐賲 賰賵丕乇鬲夭 毓丕丿賷丞 卮亘賰丞 丕賱賮賵賱丕匕 丕賱賲賯丕賵賲 賱賱氐丿兀 reloj mujer 爻丕毓丞 賲毓氐賲 賱賱賲乇兀

  31. Pingback: 4 銉斻兗銈?銈汇儍銉堛儠銈°儍銈枫儳銉冲コ鎬с儐銈c偄銉夈儹銉冦儣銉併儯銉笺儬銉嶃儍銈儸銈广偆銉ゃ儶銉炽偘銈兗銉椼儖銉炽偘銉兂銈般儢銉偣銉儍銉堛偢銉ャ偍銉兗銈汇

Leave a Reply