Home > Uncategorized > DEP Digs In On Bulls Island “Hazardous” Tree Removal

DEP Digs In On Bulls Island “Hazardous” Tree Removal

DEP’s New Plan Seeks Waivers From DEP Flood Regulations & D&R Canal Park Master Plan

Do You Want “Safe, Managed, Pedestrian Pathways” Though Mature Forests?

Lovely sycamores along riverfront walk - these trees would be cut down and this portion of the trail, above the wing dam, closed to public access.

The Christie Pinelands Commission just abused Thanksgiving to ram through a controversial pipeline approval.

Now – here they go again!

The Christie DEP is emulating those same abusive tactics to ram a controversial Bulls Island tree removal plan through over the Christmas and New Year holidays.

What is it about Bull’s Island that explains this intransigence? The murderous trees have sinned, and so now they must pay?

From our friends at PEER:

NEW JERSEY BULL’S ISLAND TREE HARVEST ON FAST TRACK

 

Plan Confines Visitor Access to “Safe, Managed, Pedestrian Pathway”

Posted on Dec 10, 2013

Trenton — New Jersey has unveiled a new plan to de-forest a large swath of Bull’s Island State Park along the Delaware River Wild & Scenic corridor, according to documents posted by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). This new plan may move to approval without public comment over the holidays as the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is seeking a “hardship” waiver from its own flood hazard control rules and the standards of the D&R Canal State Park Master Plan.

In an application for “Safety Improvements” filed with the Delaware & Raritan Canal Commission on November 18, 2013, DEP proposes to remove all trees from a 50 foot buffer on both sides of a “safe, managed pedestrian pathway” across nearly four acres of the Bull’s Island Recreation Area. This “selective” cut will also remove sycamore and other trees along the Delaware River shore.

The plan is called a safety measure because in 2011 a camper was tragically killed and his wife injured when a huge sycamore snapped and fell on their tent. DEP conducted a tree “health assessment” and determined that around half the trees are at risk of “failure.”

“With camping banned, the safety value of hacking down scores more mature trees is dubious,” stated New Jersey PEER Director Bill Wolfe, pointing out the southern half of the island is completely natural and unmanaged yet open to visitors. “People do not need a safe corridor to walk through the woods.”

Besides permanently closing the area to camping, DEP also plans to remove two bathhouses and a playground. Visitor access will be limited to this manicured parkway, leaving the rest of the northern half of the island off-limits to hiking, fishing or canoeing.

“The net result of this plan will be far less visitor access to a magnificent riverfront forest,” Wolfe said, noting that Bull’s Island is a bird watchers mecca and one of the most renowned scenic corridors east of the Mississippi. “Converting this lovely natural, mature forest into a cheaply landscaped golf course-style walkway can hardly be called an improvement. Shrubs and pussy willow make a poor replacement for a towering 200-year-old tree canopy.”

The Delaware & Raritan Canal Commission could approve the DEP application within 30 days after it is deemed complete. DEP also wants the Commission to waive its visual impact rules which discourage tree removal. The project would, however, be subject to consultation with the National Park Service and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, which raised concerns about a broader DEP clear-cut plan on Bull’s Island in 2012. PEER generated more than 20,000 signatures on an on-line petition in protest of that earlier plan.

“While we are pleased that DEP is not planning another huge clear-cut, it is still planning to take down a large number of old growth sycamores. The state should not short-circuit a full review by waiving permit rules,” Wolfe added, suggesting that the portfolio of DEP’s contractor does not feature ecological restoration work. “Of all the ecological work DEP could be doing, its persistence with this questionable project is mystifying.”

###

See the DEP Bull’s Island project application

View DEP contractor’s portfolio

Look at 20,000 signers protest 2012 Bull’s Island clear-cut plan

Revisit eco-problems with DEP’s 2012 Bull’s Island plan

New Jersey PEER is a state chapter of a national alliance of state and federal agency resource professionals working to ensure environmental ethics and government accountability

 

huge sycamore on Bull's Island - will this tree go?

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:
  1. No comments yet.
Comment pages
1 2 3 4 31057
  1. July 3rd, 2015 at 04:38 | #1
  2. July 3rd, 2015 at 05:52 | #2
  3. July 3rd, 2015 at 10:16 | #3
  4. July 3rd, 2015 at 16:35 | #4
  5. July 3rd, 2015 at 16:38 | #5
  6. July 3rd, 2015 at 16:44 | #6
  7. July 3rd, 2015 at 21:18 | #7
  8. July 3rd, 2015 at 21:44 | #8
  9. July 4th, 2015 at 01:11 | #9
  10. July 4th, 2015 at 03:03 | #10
  11. July 4th, 2015 at 15:00 | #11
  12. July 4th, 2015 at 15:32 | #12
  13. July 4th, 2015 at 16:42 | #13
  14. July 4th, 2015 at 17:14 | #14
  15. July 4th, 2015 at 18:17 | #15
  16. July 5th, 2015 at 11:55 | #16
  17. July 5th, 2015 at 12:04 | #17
  18. July 5th, 2015 at 15:40 | #18
  19. July 5th, 2015 at 17:41 | #19
  20. July 5th, 2015 at 18:10 | #20
  21. July 5th, 2015 at 18:16 | #21
  22. July 5th, 2015 at 22:39 | #22
  23. July 6th, 2015 at 01:28 | #23
  24. July 6th, 2015 at 06:58 | #24
  25. July 6th, 2015 at 14:16 | #25
  26. July 6th, 2015 at 15:57 | #26
  27. July 6th, 2015 at 16:33 | #27
  28. July 6th, 2015 at 22:33 | #28
  29. July 6th, 2015 at 23:03 | #29
  30. July 6th, 2015 at 23:23 | #30
  31. July 7th, 2015 at 03:41 | #31
  32. July 7th, 2015 at 05:34 | #32
  33. July 7th, 2015 at 07:52 | #33
  34. July 7th, 2015 at 13:33 | #34
  35. July 7th, 2015 at 14:17 | #35
  36. July 7th, 2015 at 14:18 | #36
  37. July 7th, 2015 at 14:18 | #37
  38. July 7th, 2015 at 14:19 | #38
  39. July 7th, 2015 at 14:20 | #39
  40. July 7th, 2015 at 14:55 | #40
  41. July 7th, 2015 at 15:03 | #41
  42. July 7th, 2015 at 18:09 | #42
  43. July 7th, 2015 at 23:58 | #43
  44. July 8th, 2015 at 01:53 | #44
  45. July 8th, 2015 at 11:38 | #45
  46. July 8th, 2015 at 12:24 | #46
  47. July 8th, 2015 at 12:42 | #47
  48. July 8th, 2015 at 14:13 | #48
  49. July 8th, 2015 at 16:01 | #49
  50. July 8th, 2015 at 18:55 | #50
You must be logged in to post a comment.