DEP’s New Plan Seeks Waivers From DEP Flood Regulations & D&R Canal Park Master Plan
Do You Want “Safe, Managed, Pedestrian Pathways” Though Mature Forests?
The Christie Pinelands Commission just abused Thanksgiving to ram through a controversial pipeline approval.
Now – here they go again!
The Christie DEP is emulating those same abusive tactics to ram a controversial Bulls Island tree removal plan through over the Christmas and New Year holidays.
What is it about Bull’s Island that explains this intransigence? The murderous trees have sinned, and so now they must pay?
From our friends at PEER:
NEW JERSEY BULL’S ISLAND TREE HARVEST ON FAST TRACK
Plan Confines Visitor Access to “Safe, Managed, Pedestrian Pathway”
Posted on Dec 10, 2013
Trenton — New Jersey has unveiled a new plan to de-forest a large swath of Bull’s Island State Park along the Delaware River Wild & Scenic corridor, according to documents posted by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). This new plan may move to approval without public comment over the holidays as the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is seeking a “hardship” waiver from its own flood hazard control rules and the standards of the D&R Canal State Park Master Plan.
In an application for “Safety Improvements” filed with the Delaware & Raritan Canal Commission on November 18, 2013, DEP proposes to remove all trees from a 50 foot buffer on both sides of a “safe, managed pedestrian pathway” across nearly four acres of the Bull’s Island Recreation Area. This “selective” cut will also remove sycamore and other trees along the Delaware River shore.
The plan is called a safety measure because in 2011 a camper was tragically killed and his wife injured when a huge sycamore snapped and fell on their tent. DEP conducted a tree “health assessment” and determined that around half the trees are at risk of “failure.”
“With camping banned, the safety value of hacking down scores more mature trees is dubious,” stated New Jersey PEER Director Bill Wolfe, pointing out the southern half of the island is completely natural and unmanaged yet open to visitors. “People do not need a safe corridor to walk through the woods.”
Besides permanently closing the area to camping, DEP also plans to remove two bathhouses and a playground. Visitor access will be limited to this manicured parkway, leaving the rest of the northern half of the island off-limits to hiking, fishing or canoeing.
“The net result of this plan will be far less visitor access to a magnificent riverfront forest,” Wolfe said, noting that Bull’s Island is a bird watchers mecca and one of the most renowned scenic corridors east of the Mississippi. “Converting this lovely natural, mature forest into a cheaply landscaped golf course-style walkway can hardly be called an improvement. Shrubs and pussy willow make a poor replacement for a towering 200-year-old tree canopy.”
The Delaware & Raritan Canal Commission could approve the DEP application within 30 days after it is deemed complete. DEP also wants the Commission to waive its visual impact rules which discourage tree removal. The project would, however, be subject to consultation with the National Park Service and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, which raised concerns about a broader DEP clear-cut plan on Bull’s Island in 2012. PEER generated more than 20,000 signatures on an on-line petition in protest of that earlier plan.
“While we are pleased that DEP is not planning another huge clear-cut, it is still planning to take down a large number of old growth sycamores. The state should not short-circuit a full review by waiving permit rules,” Wolfe added, suggesting that the portfolio of DEP’s contractor does not feature ecological restoration work. “Of all the ecological work DEP could be doing, its persistence with this questionable project is mystifying.”
###
See the DEP Bull’s Island project application
View DEP contractor’s portfolio
Look at 20,000 signers protest 2012 Bull’s Island clear-cut plan
Revisit eco-problems with DEP’s 2012 Bull’s Island plan
New Jersey PEER is a state chapter of a national alliance of state and federal agency resource professionals working to ensure environmental ethics and government accountability
Pingback: nike shoes
Pingback: white ray bans
Pingback: buy fitflops
Pingback: kindertrikot fc bayern gebraucht
Pingback: numeros camisetas argentina mundial 2010
Pingback: deutschland trikot 2012 gr锟斤拷n g?tze
Pingback: achat maillot juventus
Pingback: maillot exterieur fc barcelone 2011
Pingback: スーパーコピー
Pingback: trikots bayern 2014 15
Pingback: bayern m锟斤拷nchen trikot orange
Pingback: prada outlet online
Pingback: precio camiseta de barcelona sporting club 2013
Pingback: trikot bayern 2014
Pingback: tom brady infant jersey pink
Pingback: clay matthews blue jerseys
Pingback: ausw?rts trikot brasilien 2013
Pingback: nike air max 1 purple
Pingback: psg trikot lucas
Pingback: umbro manchester city home jersey
Pingback: liverpool shirts 14 15
Pingback: maillot barcelone 2014 messi
Pingback: camiseta del real madrid nueva 2014
Pingback: cheap red bottom shoes
Pingback: nike running shoes outlet
Pingback: como ganhar uma camisa do barcelona
Pingback: camiseta de brasil 2013 precio
Pingback: camisa oficial do inter de mil?o
Pingback: comprar camiseta manchester city chile
Pingback: manchester united training shirt - black white
Pingback: jersey arsenal mesut ozil
Pingback: away trikot bayern 2014
Pingback: scarpe hogan
Pingback: men nike free run
Pingback: designer leather handbags
Pingback: tommy hilfiger outlet
Pingback: mens ray ban sunglasses
Pingback: moncler polo shirt
Pingback: longchamp travel bag
Pingback: maillot equipe de portugal 2014
Pingback: camiseta del real madrid temporada 14 15
Pingback: camiseta beckham real madrid
Pingback: camiseta de portero del chelsea
Pingback: camiseta del sevilla fc 2012
Pingback: bayern away trikot 2013
Pingback: barcelona trikots 2014 15
Pingback: camiseta del inter mercadolibre
Pingback: chelsea kit rumours
Pingback: christian louboutin outlet
Pingback: kroatien neue trikots