Dupont’s License To Kill

Court Upholds Sham Settlement – Including Waiver of Liability for Wrongful Death

Settlement Was Reached By Dupont’s Deception and Fraud

My friends in Pompton Lakes just sent me a recent Superior Court decision, granting defendant Dupont’s motion for summary judgment and dismissal of a lawsuit from residents of Pompton Lakes, who had claimed various adverse health, emotional, and economic harms from Dupont’s toxic pollution. (you can read the decision here).

The Court again ruled that the lawsuit, among other reasons, was barred by a prior Settlement agreement in which hundreds of Pompton lakes residents waived all rights to sue Dupont. I’ve written about previous Court decisions along these lines, see:  F is for Fraud – S is for Shame – and D is for Dupont

But, I was not aware, and shocked to read, for the first time, about not only the scope of the liability waiver under those prior settlements, but the specific damages waived.

Among many other things, remarkably, residents of Pompton Lakes even waived their right to sue Dupont for wrongful death! (see the opinion on page 16)

Dupont lawyers must be proud of the fact that they’ve created a liability free zone – a proverbial license to kill, with impunity.

Dupont already seems to have Government regulators at DEP and EPA on a short leash, and have blocked regulatory enforcement fines and penalties and strict cleanup accountability for the toxic mess they’ve made

Now, they now have civil immunity in the courts as well.

But, one issue seems to trouble me about the Settlement agreements and I can’t figure out why the lawyers for residents don’t take the issue head on.

The Court noted that

“NJ courts favor the enforcement of settlement agreements as a matter of public policy” (decision, @p.15)

The Court went on to write that Settlement agreements are contracts that are upheld by the courts, except in limited circumstances, which include deception and fraud: (opinion on page 17):

The court concluded that

In general, settlement agreements will be honored “absent a demonstration of faux or compelling circumstances”.

But the plaintiff’s attorneys and the Court apparently did not brief or probe the issues of fraud, deception, and compelling circumstances.

As I have written, in my opinion the Dupont Pompton Lakes case involved years of deception, fraud, and compelling circumstance, amounting to a massive coverup of an imminent and substantial public health emergency (see: The Great Dupont Train RCRA).

Basically, in my opinion Dupont engaged in “unseemly behavior” and knowingly withheld critically important information about the presence of and the health risk of vapor intrusion.

People can not knowingly consent and waive liability when they are not aware of material facts that have been withheld from them. They literally could not comprehend the settlement they signed and could not have knowingly entered into that settlement or been competent to sign it.

In my opinion Dupont did so in bad faith, because those facts, if known at the time, would directly impact any settlement agreement and create huge new liabilities for Dupont.

No way would residents have signed away their ability to sue Dupont for vapor intrusion had they known about the problem to the extent Dupont did.

The plaintiff relied on the facts available to them in entering the settlement.

Dupont’s failure to disclose material facts about vapor intrusion constituted a massive deception and fraud upon which the plaintiff’s relied.

So why haven’t these issues been litigated?

So, legal eagles out there, tell me why? What exactly am I missing here?

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

105 Responses to Dupont’s License To Kill

  1. Pingback: green bay packers acme jerseys

  2. Pingback: bayern m锟斤拷nchen trikot hose 140

  3. Pingback: nueva camiseta barcelona futbol

  4. Pingback: nueva camiseta juventus 2015

  5. Pingback: tottenham wholesale jerseys

  6. Pingback: england trikot deutsch

  7. Pingback: schalke trikot raul 2011

  8. Pingback: maillot portugal 2014 nike

  9. Pingback: manchester united infant football kit

  10. Pingback: ray ban uk store

  11. Pingback: camiseta juventus titular

  12. Pingback: fitflops online australia

  13. Pingback: ajax shirt ibrahimovic

  14. Pingback: psv shirts geschiedenis

  15. Pingback: jag

  16. Pingback: comprar camiseta de inter de milan

  17. Pingback: camisetas de messi para ni?os baratas

  18. Pingback: スーパーコピーブランド

  19. Pingback: wof锟斤拷r stehen die sterne auf dem trikot bayern

  20. Pingback: vrai maillot de bain bresilien

  21. Pingback: numeros de la camiseta del real madrid 2012

  22. Pingback: hogan outlet

  23. Pingback: comprar camiseta espa?a copa confederaciones

  24. Pingback: football shirt arsenal

  25. Pingback: camiseta manchester united 2013 manga larga

  26. Pingback: nueva camiseta retro del barcelona

  27. Pingback: camiseta liverpool 2014 chile

  28. Pingback: red bottom shoes

  29. Pingback: buy ray ban

  30. Pingback: Snapback Hats

  31. Pingback: mac makeup wholesale

  32. Pingback: christian louboutin dubai

  33. Pingback: michael kors outlet

  34. Pingback: manchester united football shirt numbers

  35. Pingback: maillot bresilien chez marionnaud

  36. Pingback: air max moins cher

  37. Pingback: niederlande trikot wm 2014

  38. Pingback: image du nouveau maillot de chelsea

  39. Pingback: nike roshe run wvn buy

  40. Pingback: bayer leverkusen heimtrikot 2013 14

  41. Pingback: camisetas futbol real madrid 2014

  42. Pingback: fitflop usa

  43. Pingback: camiseta messi original

  44. Pingback: parajumpers norge

  45. Pingback: champ bailey jersey with captain patch

  46. Pingback: jimmy choo handbags

  47. Pingback: nike roshe run gs noir

  48. Pingback: camiseta original de messi argentina

  49. Pingback: camiseta mundial ecuador

  50. Pingback: imagens camisas do barcelona

Leave a Reply