Archive

Archive for August, 2011

Report: “Major Dead Zones” Along NJ Coast

August 7th, 2011 No comments

Remember when we wrote about Dead Zones Off NJ Coast?

Or discussed the presence of “Dead zones” as an indicator of possible ecosystem collapse of Barnegat Bay?

Or warned of the attack by local sewer authorities on DEP’s nitrate water quality standards that prevent excessive nutrient pollution levels in NJ’s rivers that leads to ocean dead zones?

Well, no need to fret about any of that troubling stuff.

You see, the Atlantic City Press has just identified “major dead zones” and the real problems they cause along the coast.

The Press warns readers of “major dead zones” for beach goers trying to use their cellphones!

See: South Jersey beaches are major “dead zones” for cellphone users

I guess the health of the ocean is meaningless and just a backdrop visual for those roasting on the beach and packed like sardines into those shore vacation venues.

This really would be funny if it weren’t so shameful.

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Newsflash: July Was NJ’s 2nd Hottest Month Ever

August 7th, 2011 No comments

Ding Dong the Witch is Dead!

Jim O’Neill of the Bergen Record just connected some of the dots and broke the news blackout!

See: July was NJ’s 2nd-hottest month ever. 

Put this quote in Neon lights in Times Square:

“Those data are completely consistent with our understanding of global warming,” said Alan Robock, associate director of the Center for Environmental Prediction at Rutgers. “As the average temperature of the planet warms due to human emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, individual locations are expected to follow the trend, but with a large amount of natural variability thrown in.”

That quote is almost as good as Jim Hansen’s take:

“The standard scientist answer is “you cannot blame a specific weather/climate event on global warming.” That answer, to the public, translates as “no”.  However, if the question were posed as “would these events have occurred if atmospheric carbon dioxide had remained at its pre-industrial level of 280 [parts per million] ppm?”, an appropriate answer in that case is “almost certainly not.” That answer, to the public, translates as “yes”, i.e., humans probably bear a responsibility for the extreme event.“

“In either case, the scientist usually goes on to say something about probabilities and how those are changing because of global warming. But the extended discussion, to much of the public, is chatter. The initial answer is all important. Although either answer can be defended as “correct”, we suggest that leading with the standard caveat “you cannot blame…” is misleading and allows a misinterpretation about the danger of increasing extreme events.

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Christie Clean Water Funding Claims Inflated – Funding Level Actually Cut, Reforms Stalled, Huge Deficit Remains

August 5th, 2011 No comments

Governor Christie held a Photo-Op press conference on Barnegat Bay yesterday, and is getting lots of positive media today for signing legislation authorizing $650 million in “clean water” loans from the NJ Environmental Infrastructure Trust (NJEIT) See:

The Governor’s accomplishment here is exaggerated and the press reports have a number of flaws:

1) they report the $650 million as “clean water”. This is misleading because it is a combination of “clean water” and “drinking water” money, which are distinct funding categories at DEP and NJEIT (AC Press story gets this right);

2) they leave out historical funding levels that would allow comparison of Christie to prior administrations. This is important because the Governor is taking credit, which is something he didn’t do for last year’s paltry NJEIT funding cycle (see below data), 

3) the stories fail to place funding in context, with respect to the total unfunded water infrastructure deficit.

4) There is no discussion of the controversies regarding allowable uses of the “clean water” funds and related policy problems of using funds to promote sprawl, subsidize private “brownfields” developers, and engage in pay-to-play corruption, all of which were exposed by the recent Encap scandal and Inspector General Cooper’s report. (see:

Because we’ve worked on infrastructure issues for some time, I thought we’d provide readers the data on historical NJEIT funding levels, and compare Christie with prior Administrations.

Here is the NJ EIT website data, take from individual annual May reports to the Legislature:

YEAR      Amount

2006 -      $832 million (Corzine)
2007 -      $905 million
2008 -      $705 million
2009 -      no comparable data due to federal American Reinvestment and Recovery Act
2010 -      $380 million (Christie)
2011 -      $650 million

So, it appears that Governor Christie has presided over significant reductions in NJEIT clean water and safe drinking water loan funding.

I also thought it would be good to put the annual authorization in the context of the overall water infrastucture needs.

NJ’s drinking water infrastructure deficit is $8 billion.

But that drinking water infrastructure deficit is dwarfed by overall clean water and stormwater management needs, which exceed $20 billion (sorry, this link is from an old post. DEP killed this link to the DEP’s own Infrastructure Needs Assessment – I will find another functioning link).

NJ has a total $28 billion water infrastruture deficit (exclusive of significant costs to adapt to global warming sea level rise). At $650 million/year,that will take over 40 years to finance. But by then, the tab for crumbling infrastructure will be even higher!

As I wrote last year (see: Drinking Water Needs Are Critical and Ignored):

The American Society of Civil Engineers recently issued a national Report Card – Drinking water infrastructure was determined to be the most urgent infrastructure need and it got a D minus grade! (here is NJ’s State assessment).

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conducts a national drinking water infrastructure needs assessment and submits bi-annual Reports to Congress.

According to EPA’s most recent Report, NJ has a  drinking water infrastructure deficit of  $7.962 BILLION ($4.7 BILLION for transmission and distribution alone – for NJ data, see page 18 of EPA’s Report)).

Drinking water projects received just $272 million in this year’s financing at that rate, it would take 40 years to catch up with current deficits. Of course, over that time period, billions more in investment would be required to maintain NJ’s aging infrastructure.

So, contrary to the Governor’s spin and media reports, we’ve got a lot of unfunded work and much needed policy reforms remain to be addressed.

[End Note: I have heard that retirement and staff cuts at DEP have slowed down the processing and oversight of loans, stalling clean water projects. Due to the hiring freeze, DEP is uanble to backfill positions of staff that retire – this is the worst of all possible worlds, as DEP loses experienced professionals and manpower. The environment and the economy suffer from this shortsighted mismangement.]

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

On the Way to Lance Protest – South Branch Raritan River

August 2nd, 2011 No comments

I was early for the Lance protest, had some time on my hands, so took a stroll – here’s what I saw (it’s out there):

raritan77

rarritan777

butterfly

dragonfly

raritan4

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Congressman Lance Blasted for Support of Budget Hostage Deal

August 2nd, 2011 1 comment
constituents blast Lance for supporting budget hostage deal

constituents blast Lance for supporting budget hostage deal

[Update #2 – 8/12/11 – Is Lance all in with the Tea Party? Read abut 8/10/11 Morris County event

Update #1: 8/3/11 – The Hunterdon County Democrat is soliciting reader comments – suggest you hit this link and comment. Here’s the comment I sent over:

Unfortunately, I am unable to comment on your site. Feel free to use anything from my blog post or email and attribute it to me.

FYI, during the meeting, one constituent said she called Lance to oppose his vote for the radical Ryan budget plan. In a 20 minute conversation, she said Lance told her he opposed it but voted for it because he knew it would not pass the Senate. Hearing this, some others said Lance was simply currying favor with Speaker Boehner – this is not the strong principled man I know and like.

I am very concerned that Lance is joining – or silently not opposing –  a right wing republcan attack on the environment – please see this NY Times story for a host of bills they just passed or are pushing in House.  Bill Wolfe – end update] 

I just got back from a meeting of about 25 deeply unhappy constituents of Congressman Leonard Lance (R) NJ-7. The protest cum meeting was held at Lance’s Flemington District office. 

The event, part of a nation-wide initiative sponsored by Moveon.org, was billed as a protest:

Republicans are about to push our nation off an economic cliff. Over the next 48 hours we need to mobilize as many of our neighbors, family, and friends as possible to demand the Republicans stop playing dangerous political games and do what’s right for America.

At noon on Tuesday—whether there’s a deal in place or if we’re about to default on our nation’s bills—we’re protesting at hundreds of GOP offices around the country. We’ll show our outrage that they’ve held our whole economy hostage to force cuts to vital programs and to protect tax breaks for corporations and millionaires.

We’ll gather in front of our Republican senators’ and representatives’ offices to speak out against their attack on our economy.

I guess Lance’s office was smart enough to avoid the bad protest sign visuals and invite the group inside for a cordial, respectful meeting.

It was a diverse group (age, gender, issues of concern),who were unified in their disgust with the TeaParty driven Republican hostage taking tactics (and Democratic dives:”I know I’ve said this before, but they [Democrats] are not a progressive political party, not even secretly, deep inside. They just play one on television.”) , attacks on government, and radical efforts to dismantle government and destroy the middle class.

All who spoke strongly criticized Lance for not standing up against that.

Several folks said they were republicans and/or Lance supporters. They too were shocked by how Lance had reversed his principled stances as a moderate, good government, intelligent republican while serving in the NJ legislature.

At the outset of the meeting, Lance’s aid distributed a press statement. Recognizing that a Right wing vote is out of step with his longstanding NJ record, Lance attempted to link his vote with his NJ reputation as a fiscal conservative:

I intend to vote for the bipartisan, bicameral compromise agreement that avoids default, adds certainty to our economy, and puts our Nation on a sustainable path towards fiscal responsibility.

… This support is consistent with my long-standing efforts to bring fiscal sanity to New Jersey…

But it didn’t wash. No way.

The meeting then was opened so each person could talk personally about why they were there.

Whether defending social security and safety net programs, gay rights, public health, education, urban revitalization, racial justice, jobs, tax fairnesss/shared sacrifice, and protecting the environment – or criticizing the corporate dominance of our politics – participants uniformly were civil, respectful, passionate, informed, and articulate in voicing their concerns.

One woman, a middle aged European immigrant, recalled that when she came to the US, the American dream of hard work and a middle classs lifestyle deeply attracted her. She contrasted that with the rigid class system of her European home. But now, she lamented that the dream is being destroyed and replaced by an ugly pattern of attacks on immigrants and the middle class. Sadly, American is becoming a polarized nation of rich and poor, she said. 

In response, Lance’s aid attempted to defend him from the withering criticisms and rebut some of the statements made in opposition to Lance’s recent actions. But he got criticized for that – folks wanted him to listen to them, not mouth Lance’s spin.

People wanted to know why they could not speak directly with Lance via conference call, and questioned why their concerns were not being listened to and documented.

I spoke twice briefly.

In addition to noting the contrast betwee Lance’s DC Congressional actions and his NJ record and reputation in the NJ legislature, I noted that Lance had been a strong supporter of environmental issues. (see: The curious transformation of Leonard Lance). 

I warned his aide that that the 7th district was far more moderate than Washington TeaParty politics, and thus re-election was not a lock for him. I backed that up by illustration of how Holt had knocked out an incumbent in the Republican leaning adjacent 12th District.

Categories: Uncategorized Tags: