NJ Unveils Cancer Plan – but leaves out chemicals?
According to today’s Bergen Record:
“New Jersey officials released a second five-year plan for “controlling” cancer on Friday, saying that much has been accomplished but much remains to be done in a state with one of the highest rates of cancer in the nation.”
N.J. unveils 5-year plan for combating cancer
http://www.northjersey.com/news/18824564.html
I find it extremely curious that this coverage failed to mention environmental and occupational exposure to industrial chemicals – does the State’s Plan share this deficiency?
Compare that coverage to the Houston Chronicle’s investigative series on chemical pollution “In Harm’s Way”
http://blog.nj.com/njv_bill_wolfe/2008/01/what_they_dont_want_you_to_see.html
Or this statement by DEP Commissioner Lisa Jackson, based upon expert testimony last month to the NJ Clean Air Council “Experts and Advocates: Pollution from Ports A High Cancer Risk to Urban NJ
http://blog.nj.com/njv_bill_wolfe/2008/04/experts_and_advocates_pollutio.html
Here are some incovenient truths I hope ther State’s Cancer Prevention plan considered:
NJ residents are bombarded – on a daily basis while at home, work and outdoors – by multiple exposures to known human chemical carcinogens in air, water, soil, and food:
1) NJ has statewide ambient air pollution levels for hazardous air pollutants that exceed EPA cancer benchmarks by hundreds or thousands of times (this data has been on the front page of the Record).
2) NJ drinking water across the state has been found to be contaminated with carcinogens, and hundreds of municipal and private wells have been shut down due to chemical contamination.
3) Soil and groundwater are tainted by carcinogens at 18,000 toxic waste sites; 114 Superfund sites (the most in the nation); hundreds of uncontrolled leaky landfills and dumps; and over 6,000 know groundwater pollution sites.
4) NJ has an industrial legacy, a large active petro-chemical industry sector, and is the nation’s most densely populated state. Occupational exposure to carcinogens is widespread in NJ workplaces.
5) A joint federal/state cancer cluster study in Tom’s River found that rare forms of childhood cancers in girls was both statistically and causally related to a toxic air pollutant released by a local industry.
I could go on, so I assume you get my drift.
But I see nothing in the story about the environment/toxic chemicals as a contributing cause of cancer (other than naturally occurring radon and sunlight).
What’s up with that?
Are environmental carcinogens addressed in the DoH’s 5 year plan?
Reader input welcome – I could not find a link to the State’s 5 Year Cancer Prevention Plan.