Corzine Model for Privatized Toxic Site Cleanup Fails Audits

Bill WolfeDEP Commissioner Lisa Jackson and Assitant Commissioner Kropp propose privatized toxic site cleanup program to joint Assembly and Senate Envrionment Committee hearing.
Audits of the Massachusetts model have consistently shown high rates of non-compliance with cleanup regulations.

Serious Violations Found in More than Two-Thirds of Audited Massachusetts Sites

Bill WolfeHal Bozarth – lobbyist for the NJ Chemistry Council.
The Godfather of Toxics in NJ.

More than two out of three privately supervised toxic clean-ups in a Massachusetts program that New Jersey wants to adopt failed audits with serious violations, according to records released today by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). Despite these red flags, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is rushing to embrace further privatization of its troubled toxic remediation program as a cost-free panacea.
State audits of work done by licensed private consultants in Massachusetts during the April to June 2007 period indicated the following:
* Serious violations were found in 21 of 30 sites subjected to full (Level 3) reviews, for a failure rate of 70%. The “most common violation cited was…failure to define the horizontal and vertical extent and concentrations of oil and/or hazardous materials”, according to the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection audit report; and
* Less intensive audits yielded a lower percentage of violations with 24 of 89 sites subjected to Level 2 reviews found to be out of compliance, with the most common violation being failure to follow the clean-up plan specifications.
“These audits show that privatization is not a substitute for strict public oversight,” stated New Jersey PEER Director Bill Wolfe, a former DEP analyst. “The central problem at DEP is not lack of resources but the poorest departmental leadership within memory.”

Bill WolfeThe NJ Chemical Industry Network, Chamber of Commerce and Business Industry Association strongly support DEP privatization.
DO YOU TRUST THESE GUYS WITH YOUR HEALTH?

PEER argues that DEP has an unrealistic view of its plan to license private sector consultants to replace state employees in overseeing remediation of contaminated sites program by overlooking –
Privatization does not mean the program is free. DEP has disclosed no cost study to justify the proposed outsourcing and no plan to plan for financing the program.
Nor is it clear how the state will save any money in its operation.
Perhaps most importantly, DEP has failed to prioritize any of its more than 16,000 toxic sites – something DEP is legally required to do and has promised to do for the past two years. Without a ranking system, public health will remain secondary to developer interest in deciding where to invest scarce resources.

In a recent opinion piece, DEP Assistant Commissioner Irene Kropp wrote “We recognize that we still have details to work out, and we will do so working closely with the Legislature and stakeholder groups”.
“Ignoring all evidence to the contrary, DEP has decided to bull forward” Wolfe added. “DEP is guilty of magical thinking about privatization as the preordained solution without working it through.”
###
See the latest audit results for Massachusetts privatized clean-ups
http://www.mass.gov/dep/cleanup/compliance/lspa607.htm
Find out more about the DEP toxic privatization plan
http://www.peer.org/news/news_id.php?row_id=1027
Look at DEP’s failure to rank its 16,000 toxic sites
http://www.peer.org/news/news_id.php?row_id=909
View the Irene Kropp op-ed
http://www.northjersey.com/opinion/moreviews/18098194.html

Bill WolfeAssembly Environment Committee Chairman John McKeon (D/Essex) and Senate Environment Committee Chairman Bob Smith (D/Middlesex) conduct joint oversight hearing of DEP toxic site cleanup program.
Will McKeon and Smith allow privatization to happen?.